UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/624409
APPLICANT: Oberkotter Foundation
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
|
MARK: DREAMS MADE REAL
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 0605134-0301
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
MAILING/E-MAILING DATE INFORMATION: If the mailing or e-mailing date of this Office action does not appear above, this information can be obtained by visiting the USPTO website at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/, inserting the application serial number, and viewing the prosecution history for the mailing date of the most recently issued Office communication.
Serial Number 76/624409
This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed January 1, 2006. The standard character claim has been accepted and entered. However, after careful consideration, the failure to function refusal is continued and made FINAL.
In the prior Office action, registration was refused because the proposed mark, as used on the specimen of record, is the title of a single creative work, namely, the title of a specific compact disc and the same pamphlet, and thus fails to function as a trademark for such goods. Trademark Act Sections 1, 2 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §1051, 1052 and 1127; In re Cooper, 254 F.2d 611, 117 USPQ 396 (C.C.P.A. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 840, 119 USPQ 501 (1958); In re Hal Leonard Publishing Corp., 15 USPQ2d 1574 (TTAB 1990); In re Scholastic Inc., 223 USPQ 431 (TTAB 1984); TMEP §1202.08.
Applicant replied claiming that the mark is used on a series of parental resource materials. However, the applicant failed to provide any evidence to support this contention. Specifically, the applicant has not shown that the mark is used on a series of compact discs or teaching pamphlets.
Applicant is advised that the name of a series of creative works may be registrable if the designation serves to identify and distinguish the source of the goods. In re Scholastic Inc., 23 USPQ2d 1774 (TTAB 1992). The evidence required in not insurmountable. Indeed, the evidence required to overcome this refusal merely comprises a few compact discs and a few teaching pamphlets, both showing the mark as a source identifier for the goods.
Therefore, if applicant uses the mark to identify a series, rather than a single work, then applicant should provide such evidence for the record so this refusal can be withdrawn. Evidence of a series includes copies of multiple book covers or packaging for prerecorded works that show the mark as a source-identifier for the series as well as show the mark as distinguishable from the individual titles of the works.
In conclusion, the examining attorney continues and makes FINAL the failure to function refusal under Trademark Act Sections 1, 2 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §1051, 1052 and 1127.
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or, if appropriate, (3) filing of a petition to the Director if permitted by 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b). 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §715.01. Regarding petitions to the Director, see 37 C.F.R. §2.146 and TMEP Chapter 1700. If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
/Gene V.J. Maciol/
Gene V.J. Maciol
Trademark Attorney Advisor
Law Office 103
571 272 9280
571 273 9280 fax
HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:
STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.
VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.
The title of a single creative work is NOT registrable on the Principal Register or the Supplemental Register. Examples of "single creative works" include books, videotapes, films and theatrical performances. Herbko International, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1162, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2002) ("the title of a single book cannot serve as a source identifier"); In re Cooper, 254 F.2d 611, 615-16, 117 USPQ 396, 400 (C.C.P.A. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 840, 119 USPQ 501 (1958) ("A book title ... identifies a specific literary work ... and is not associated in the public mind with the publisher, printer or bookseller...."); In re Posthuma, 45 USPQ2d 2011 (TTAB 1998) (title of a live theater production held unregistrable); In re Hal Leonard Publishing Corp., 15 USPQ2d 1574 (TTAB 1990) (INSTANT KEYBOARD, as used on music instruction books, found unregistrable as the title of a single work); In re Appleby, 159 USPQ 126 (TTAB 1968) (title of single phonograph record, as distinguished from series, does not function as mark).
The name of a series of books or other creative works MAY be registrable if it serves to identify and distinguish the source of the goods. In re Scholastic Inc., 23 USPQ2d 1774, 1778 (TTAB 1992) (THE MAGIC SCHOOL BUS, prominently displayed on the cover of a series of books, has come to represent a source to purchasers and would be recognized as a trademark). However, a term used in the title of a series of books is not registrable if it merely identifies a character in the books. In re Scholastic Inc., 223 USPQ 431 (TTAB 1984) (THE LITTLES, used in the title of each in a series of children's books, does not function as a mark where it merely identifies the main characters in the books). Cf. In re Caserta, 46 USPQ2d 1088 (TTAB 1998) (FURR-BALL FURCANIA, used as the principal character in a single children's book, was found not to function as a mark even though the character's name appeared on the cover and every page of the story); In re Frederick Warne & Co. Inc., 218 USPQ 345 (TTAB 1983) (an illustration of a frog used on the cover of a single book served only to depict the main character in the book and did not function as a trademark).