Mark For: ZOOM WORKOUT™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
>Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark.
Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 76608953 |
Mark Literal Elements | ZOOM WORKOUT |
Mark Drawing Type | 5 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WITH WORD(S) /LETTER(S)/ NUMBER(S) INSTYLIZED FORM |
Mark Type | SERVICE MARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2010-08-10 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Attorney Name | Holly M. Emge |
Law Office Assigned | M50 |
Employee Name | NEVILLE, JAMES B |
2004-08-27 | Application Filed |
2010-07-09 | Abandon |
2010-08-10 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2010-08-10 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
2010-08-10 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | ![]() |
Address | 2913 El Camino Real, #712 Tustin, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 92782 |
Legal Entity Type | Individual |
![]() | 2004-08-27 | |
![]() | 2004-08-27 | |
![]() | APPLICATION/XML | 2004-09-11 |
![]() | 2005-03-28 | |
![]() | 2005-03-29 | |
![]() | 2005-09-28 | |
![]() | 2005-10-20 | |
![]() | 2010-01-06 | |
![]() | 2010-01-08 | |
![]() | APPLICATION/XML | 2010-08-10 |
(ABANDONED)
IC 041. US 100 101 107. G & S: Educational and training services, namely, conducting seminars, workshops, lectures and classes in the field of health and physical fitness
International Codes: | 41 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
CC0000 | Color is not claimed as a feature of the mark. |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2010-08-10 | |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2010-08-10 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2010-01-08 | 76737 |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2010-01-08 | |
SUSPENSION CHECKED TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | 2009-09-18 | 78289 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2009-09-03 | 78289 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2009-03-03 | 78145 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-08-28 | 78145 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2008-02-28 | 78145 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2007-08-28 | 78145 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-12-08 | 78145 |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2006-12-08 | 78145 |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-05-04 | 76537 |
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2005-10-21 | 76737 |
CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | 2005-10-21 | |
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | 2005-10-16 | 72067 |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-09-28 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2005-09-28 | 72067 |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2005-03-29 | 76737 |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2005-03-29 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2005-03-28 | 76737 |
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2004-09-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.