UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
|
SERIAL NO: 76/608861
APPLICANT: ANTON/BAUER, INC.
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: McCormick, Paulding & Huber LLP |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
|
|
MARK: SNAP-ON
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: N/A
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/608861
The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application filed on August 24, 2004, and has determined the following.
The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02. However, Applicant must respond to the following requirements.
2(f) Acquired Distinctiveness
Applicant’s claim of acquired distinctiveness is accepted.
Specimens
Applicant must submit a substitute specimen showing use of the mark for the goods specified in the application, because the mark on the specimen currently of record is not legible. If Applicant submits the same specimen with a different camera angle, Applicant does not need to submit a verified statement. 37 C.F.R. §2.56; TMEP §904. However, if Applicant submits a different specimen, Applicant must also submit a statement that “the substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application,” verified with a notarized affidavit or a signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.09.
Sample Declaration for Substitute Specimen
The following is a sample declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 with a supporting statement for a substitute specimen:
The undersigned being warned that willful false statements and the like are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements and the like may jeopardize the validity of the application or document or any registration resulting there from, declares that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
_____________________________
(Signature)
_____________________________
(Print or Type Name and Position)
_____________________________
(Date)
Amend to 1(b)
If applicant cannot comply with the requirement for a specimen for the 1(a) basis asserted, then applicant may substitute a different basis for filing if applicant can meet the requirements for the new basis. See TMEP §§806.03 et seq.
In this case, applicant may wish to amend the application to assert a 1(b) basis.
Where an application is based on a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce, applicant must submit the following statement:
Applicant has had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application since the filing date of the application.
This statement must be verified with a notarized affidavit or a signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20 and 2.33. Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2); TMEP §806.01(b).
Applicant’s claim of ownership of U.S. Registration Nos. 1,405,551 and 1,619,488 will not be printed on any registration which may issue from this application because Office records show that the claimed registrations are cancelled. Only claims of ownership of live registrations are printed. 37 C.F.R. §2.36; TMEP §812.
Effective January 31, 2005 and pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, the following are the fees that will be charged for filing a trademark application:
(1) $325 per international class if filed electronically using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS); or
(2) $375 per international class if filed on paper
These fees will be charged not only when a new application is filed, but also when payments are made to add classes to an existing application. If such payments are submitted with a TEAS response, the fee will be $325 per class, and if such payments are made with a paper response, the fee will be $375 per class.
The new fee requirements will apply to any fees filed on or after January 31, 2005.
NOTICE: TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATION
The Trademark Operation has relocated to Alexandria, Virginia. Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:
Commissioner for Trademarks
P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
Applicants, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.
My Law Office moved on October 28, 2004. To reach me by phone call (571) 272-9709.
/Anne M. Farrell/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 105
(703) 308-9105, ext. 405
HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:
STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.
VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.
GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.