Offc Action Outgoing

M-POWER

Muncie Power Products, Inc.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           76/608602

 

    APPLICANT:         Muncie Power Products, Inc.

 

 

        

*76608602*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  GEOFFREY R. MYERS

  HALL, MYERS, VANDE SANDE & PEQUIGNOT

  10220 RIVER RD STE 200

  POTOMAC MD 20854-4932

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:       M-POWER

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   2152.1220

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  76/608602

 

The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following.

 

Search of Office Records

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d).  TMEP§704.02.

 

Before the application may proceed to publication, applicant must address the following.

 

Identification of Goods

 

The current wording used to describe the goods needs clarification because the nature of the goods is unclear. Applicant may adopt the following identification of goods, if accurate:

 

Computer software to assist customers in the selection of truck mounted auxiliary power components to match a particular commercial truck, in International Class 009.

 

TMEP §1402.01.

 

Classification of Goods

 

Applicant must correct the classification of the goods in the application and amend the application to classify them in International Class 009.  37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7) and 2.85; TMEP §§1401.02(a) and 1401.03(b).

 

Clarification as to Drawing Type

 

Because of the lack of stylization of the font used to depict the mark on the drawing page, applicant must clarify whether a standard form character drawing or a special-form drawing format was intended. 

In a standard character drawing, the mark on the drawing consists of only words, letters or numbers, but does not include any designs or claims as to particular font style, size, or color.  The hallmark of a standard character drawing is one that is submitted in all capital letters with no additional stylization or design element.  A registration for a mark using a standard character drawing affords protection not only for the standard character version of the mark, but for any possible renderings of the mark, as long as those renderings do not contain any design elements; i.e., a registered standard character drawing of the mark gives protection for display on the specimens in any lettering style.  A special-form drawing, on the other hand, shows the mark in stylized letters and/or with a design element and provides protection for only that specific rendering.  37 C.F.R. §2.52; Exam Guide 01-03, section I; See TMEP §§807.06 et seq. and TMEP §807.07 et seq.

If a standard character drawing was intended, applicant must state so for the record and submit the following statement: The mark is presented in standard character format without claim to any particular font style, size, or color.”  37 C.F.R. §2.52(a).  If a special-form drawing was intended, then applicant must submit a new drawing showing the mark in stylized letters.  37 C.F.R. §2.52(b).  If applicant chooses to submit a new drawing, please note that the mark in a drawing cannot be amended if the change would materially alter the mark.  TMEP §807.14(a).  The Office determines whether a proposed amendment materially alters a mark by comparing the proposed amendment with the drawing of the mark filed with the original application.  37 C.F.R. §2.72; TMEP §807.14(a)(i).

If republication of the amended mark would be necessary in order to provide proper notice to third parties for opposition purposes, then the mark has been materially altered and the amendment is not permitted.  In re Who? Vision Systems Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1211, 1218 (TTAB 2000).  “The modified mark must contain the essence of the original mark, and the new form must create the impression of being essentially the same mark.”  Visa International Service Association v. Life Code Systems, Inc., 220 USPQ 740, 743 (TTAB 1983).  “That is, the new and old forms of the mark must create essentially the same commercial impression.”  In re Nationwide Industries Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1882, 1885 (TTAB 1988).

 

If the applicant has any questions regarding this Office Action it may contact the examining attorney directly at the telephone number listed below.

 

 

NOTICE:  FEE CHANGE   

 

Effective January 31, 2005 and pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, the following are the fees that will be charged for filing a trademark application:

 

(1) $325 per international class if filed electronically using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS); or 

 

(2)   $375 per international class if filed on paper

 

These fees will be charged not only when a new application is filed, but also when payments are made to add classes to an existing application. If such payments are submitted with a TEAS response, the fee will be  $325 per class, and if such payments are made with a paper response, the fee will be $375 per class.

 

The new fee requirements will apply to any fees filed on or after January 31, 2005.

 

NOTICE:  TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATION

 

The Trademark Operation has relocated to Alexandria, Virginia.  Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

Applicants, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.

 

 

/Katrina Edge/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 111

Ph:  (571) 272-5886

Fax: (571) 271-9111

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

  • ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions, but if the Office Action issued via email you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office Action to respond via TEAS).
  • REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above and include the serial number, law office number and examining attorney’s name in your response.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed