Reconsideration Letter

ONE SIZE FITS ALL MAGIC STRETCH GLOVES STRETCHED TO ALL SIZES FOR A SUPER FIT

ELEGANT HEADWEAR CO., INC.

Reconsideration Letter

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           76/605639

 

    APPLICANT:         ELEGANT HEADWEAR CO., INC.

 

 

 

*76605639*

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  MYRON AMER

  MYRON AMER, P.C.

  114 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 310

  MINEOLA NY 11501-4410

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

If no fees are enclosed, the address should include the words "Box Responses - No Fee."

    MARK:       ONE SIZE FITS ALL MAGIC STRETCH GLOVES S ETC.

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   N/A

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4.  Your telephone number and e-mail address..

 

 

 

Serial Number 76/605639

 

Applicant is requesting reconsideration of a final refusal dated July 25, 2005.

 

The substitute drawing is acceptable.  The amended identification of goods is acceptable. After careful consideration of the law and facts of the case, the examining attorney must deny the request for reconsideration and adhere to the final action as written since no new facts or reasons have been presented that are significant and compelling with regard to the point at issue.  The amendment to the identification of goods does not obviate the likelihood of confusion.  Registrant’s goods could be ambidextrous as they are not limited otherwise; further, applicant’s goods could be “fashionable” and it is noted that they are in multicolors, which is a fashionable feature.  The goods are highly related and used by the same consumers.  Further, stretch is a descriptive term and not the dominant feature of applicant’s mark.  As to the disclaimer, whether or not the physical feature is patented, the words in the trademark are descriptive.  The examiner does note, however, that the accurate disclaimer should read as follows (the spelling was not clear in the original drawing because of the copy quality, but is clear in the substitute drawing, showing that the wording should be as follows:              No claim is made to the exclusive right to use ONE SIZE FITS ALL and STRETCH GLOVES and STRETCHES TO ALL SIZES FOR A SUPER FIT apart from the mark as shown.)  Note that applicant had previously given most of this disclaimer.

 

Accordingly, applicant’s request for reconsideration is denied.  The time for appeal runs from the date the final action was mailed.  37 C.F.R. Section 2.64(b); TMEP Section 715.03(c).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rebecca L. Gilbert

/Rebecca L. Gilbert/

Law Office 104

571-272-9431

 

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed