Offc Action Outgoing

VISTINE

VistaPharm, Inc.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           76/604102

 

    APPLICANT:         VistaPharm, Inc.

 

 

        

*76604102*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  L. F. HILBERS

  PO BOX 19393

  BIRMINGHAM AL 35219-9393

 

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:       VISTINE

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   T-0561-b

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  76/604102

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.

Search Result/Prior Pending Application

 

The Office records have been searched and no similar registered mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.  However, please be advised that a potentially conflicting mark in a prior-filed pending application may present a bar to registration.

 

Information regarding pending Application Serial No. 78/220182 is enclosed.  The filing date of the referenced application precedes applicant’s filing date.  There may be a likelihood of confusion between the two marks under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  If the referenced application registers, registration may be refused in this case under Section 2(d).  37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §1208.01.

 

If applicant believes there is no potential conflict between this application and the earlier-filed application, then applicant may present arguments relevant to the issue.  The election to file or not to file such a request at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue at a later point.

 

Informalities

 

Upon receipt of applicant’s response resolving the following requirement(s), action on this application will be suspended pending the disposition of the above listed application number(s).  37 C.F.R. §2.83(c); TMEP §§716.02(c) and 1208.02(c).

 

Identification of Goods

 

The identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite.  The applicant must specify the nature of the goods.  The application encompasses goods that may be classified in more than one class.  Pharmaceutical goods are classified in international class 5 while medical products are classified in international class 10.

 

The applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate: 

 

Pharmaceutical and health care products, namely, (SPECIFY type of goods and classify accordingly), in international class 5;

 

Health care products, namely, (SPECIFY type of goods and classify accordingly), in international class 10.

 

TMEP §1402.01.

 

While an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.

 

Please note that parentheses and brackets are generally not acceptable in the identification of goods.  TMEP §1402.12.  Where indicated “(SPECIFY type . . .),” the examining attorney has merely suggested ways to cure the indefiniteness of the identification.  The applicant may use the suggested identification of goods as a guide for providing an acceptable identification of goods.  However, the applicant must list the goods without parenthesis.  In instances where the goods may be classified in several different classes, the applicant must list those goods separately according to classes.

 

For assistance with identifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of  Goods and Services at http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/offices/tac/doc/gsmanual/.

 

 

Classification

 

Because the nature of the goods is unclear at this time, the examining attorney defers any conclusion as to the classification of the goods until the applicant has responded with an amendment to the identification of goods.

 

If the applicant adopts the suggested amendment to the identification of goods, the applicant must amend the classification to at least International Classes 5 and 10.  37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7) and 2.85; TMEP §§805 and 1401 et seq. 

 

Applicant must adopt the appropriate international classification number for the goods and services identified in the application.  The United States uses the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks, established by the World Intellectual Property Organization to classify goods and services.  37 C.F.R. §6.1; TMEP §§1401 et seq.

Combined Application

 

Applicant must clarify the number of classes for which registration is sought.  The submitted filing fees are insufficient to cover all the classes in the application.  Specifically, the application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least two (2) international classes, however applicant paid the fee for only one class(es).

 

Applicant must either: (1) restrict the application to the number of class(es) covered by the fee already paid, or (2) pay the required fee for each additional class(es).  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.0l, 1401.04, 1401.04(b) and 1403.01.

 

If applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple-class application, then applicant must comply with each of the following:

 

(1)   Applicant must list the goods and/or services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order.  TMEP § 1403.01; and

 

(2)   Applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods and/or services not covered by the fee already paid.  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.01 and 1403.01.

Standard Character Claim

 

Applicant must submit the following standard character claim:  “The mark is presented in standard characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or color.”  37 C.F.R. §2.52(a).

 

 

NOTICE:  FEE CHANGE   

 

Effective January 31, 2005 and pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, the following are the fees that will be charged for filing a trademark application:

 

(1) $325 per international class if filed electronically using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS); or 

 

(2)   $375 per international class if filed on paper

 

These fees will be charged not only when a new application is filed, but also when payments are made to add classes to an existing application. If such payments are submitted with a TEAS response, the fee will be  $325 per class, and if such payments are made with a paper response, the fee will be $375 per class.

 

The new fee requirements will apply to any fees filed on or after January 31, 2005.

 

NOTICE:  TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATION

 

The Trademark Operation has relocated to Alexandria, Virginia.  Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

Applicants, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.

 

 

/Alex S. Keam/

Attorney

Law Office 114

Phone: (571) 272-9176 or (703) 255-4823

Fax for Responses: (571) 273-9114

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

  • ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions, but if the Office Action issued via email you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office Action to respond via TEAS).
  • REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above and include the serial number, law office number and examining attorney’s name in your response.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed