UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  76/598767

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.

 

No Conflicting Marks

 

The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d).  TMEP section 1105.01.

 

Disclaimer

 

Trademark Act Section 6(a), 15 U.S.C. Section 1056(a), permits the Office to require a disclaimer of an unregistrable component of a mark.  Trademark Act Section 2(e), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(e), bars the registration of a mark which is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive of the goods. Therefore, the Commissioner may require the disclaimer of a portion of a mark which, when used in connection with the goods or services, is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive.  If an applicant does not comply with a disclaimer requirement, the examining attorney may refuse registration of the entire mark.  TMEP section 1213.01(b).

 

The applicant must insert a disclaimer of TEX-CAJUN RESTAURANT CHICKEN SEAFOOD MEXICAN BARBECUE in the application.  Trademark Act Section 6, 15 U.S.C. Section 1056; TMEP section 1213.  TEX-CAJUN describes the type of food served at applicant’s restaurant.  RESTAURANT is generic for the services.  CHICKEN, SEAFOOD, MEXICAN, and BARBECUE describe the food items which make up applicant’s menu.

 

The computerized printing format for the Trademark Official Gazette requires a standard form for a disclaimer.   TMEP section 1213.09(a)(i).  A properly worded disclaimer should read as follows:

 

            No claim is made to the exclusive right to use TEX-CAJUN RESTAURANT CHICKEN SEAFOOD MEXICAN BARBECUE  apart from the mark as shown.

 

See In re Owatonna Tool Co., 231 USPQ 493 (Comm'r Pats. 1983).

 

Drawing is Unacceptable

 

The drawing is not acceptable because it will not reproduce satisfactorily.  It contains gray color.  The applicant must submit a new drawing showing the mark clearly and conforming to 37 C.F.R. §2.52.  TMEP §807.07(a).

 

The requirements for a special‑form drawing are as follows:

 

(1) The drawing must appear in black and white; no color is permitted.

 

(2)  Every line and letter must be black and clear.

 

(3)  The use of gray to indicate shading is unacceptable.

 

(4)  The lining must not be too fine or too close together.

 

(5)  The preferred size of the area in which the mark is displayed is 2½ inches (6.1 cm.) high and 2½ inches (6.1 cm.) wide.  It should not be larger than 4 inches (10.3 cm.) high or 4 inches (10.3 cm.) wide.

 

(6)  If the reduction of the mark to the required size renders any details illegible, the applicant may insert a statement in the application to describe the mark and these details.

 

37 C.F.R. §2.52; TMEP §§807.01(b) and 807.07(a).  The Office will enforce these drawing requirements strictly. 

 

The Office prefers that the drawing be depicted on a separate sheet of smooth, nonshiny, white paper 8 to 8½ inches (20.3 to 21.6 cm.) wide and 11 inches (27.9 cm.) long, and that the sheet contain a heading listing, on separate lines, the applicant’s complete name; the applicant’s address; the goods or services recited in the application; and, if the application is filed under Section 1(a) of the Act, the dates of first use of the mark and of first use of the mark in commerce; or, if the application is filed under Section 44(d), the priority filing date of the foreign application.  37 C.F.R. §2.52(b); TMEP §§807.01(a), 807.01(b), 807.01(c) and 807.07(a).

 

Filing Basis

 

Applicant asserts use of the mark in commerce for the services and applicant asserts that it has a bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce for the same services.  Applicant must delete one basis or divide services between the two bases, as appropriate. An applicant may not assert both use of the mark in commerce, under Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. § 1051(a), and intent to use the mark in commerce, under Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. § 1051(b), for the same goods or services.  37 C.F.R. §2.34(b)(1); TMEP §806.02(b).

 

Where an application is based on use of the mark in commerce, applicant must satisfy the following requirements:

 

(1)  Applicant must submit a statement that “the mark is in use in commerce, as defined by 15 U.S.C. §1127, and was in use in such commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application on the application filing date;”

 

(2)  Applicant must specify the date of first use of the mark anywhere on or in connection with the goods or services;

 

(3)  Applicant must specify the date of first use of the mark in commerce as a trademark or service mark; and

 

(4)  Applicant must submit one “specimen” that shows the mark used on the goods, or in connection with the services, for each class of goods and services (i.e., showing how the applicant actually uses the mark in commerce).  If the specimen was not filed with the initial application, applicant must submit a written statement that “the specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the application filing date.”

 

These requirements must be verified by applicant in a notarized affidavit or a signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20 and 2.33.  Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. §1051(a); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1) and 2.59(a); TMEP §806.01(a).

 

Where an application is based on a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce, applicant must submit the following statement:

 

Applicant has had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the filing date of the application.

 

This statement must be verified with a notarized affidavit or a signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §§2.20 and 2.33.  Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. §1051(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(2); TMEP §806.01(b).

 

 

 

Specimen for 1(a) Application

 

Applicant must submit (1) a specimen (i.e., an example of how applicant actually uses its mark in the sale or advertising of its services) showing the mark as it is used in commerce, and, (2) a statement that “the specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application,” verified with a notarized affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20.  37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.09.

 

A specimen showing use of the mark in the sale or advertising of the identified services is required for an application based on use of the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. §1051(a).  TMEP §904.  The instant application does not include a specimen.

 

Examples of acceptable specimens for services are signs, photographs, brochures, website printouts or advertisements that show the mark used in the sale or advertising of the services.  TMEP §§1301.04 et seq.

 

The following is a properly worded declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20.  At the end of the response, the applicant should insert the declaration signed by a person authorized to sign under 37 C.F.R. §2.33(a).

 

The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting registration, declares that the facts set forth in this application are true; all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true; and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

 

_____________________________

(Signature)

 

_____________________________

(Print or Type Name and Position)

 

_____________________________

(Date)

 

 

 

General Information

 

For your convenience, the Trademark Status Line, (703) 305-8747, has been established for immediate case status inquiries, and is available Monday through Friday, from 6:30 a.m. until

Midnight, Eastern Standard Time.

 

If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this letter, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

NOTICE:  FEE CHANGE   

 

Effective January 31, 2005 and pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, the following are the fees that will be charged for filing a trademark application:

 

(1) $325 per international class if filed electronically using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS); or 

 

(2)   $375 per international class if filed on paper

 

These fees will be charged not only when a new application is filed, but also when payments are made to add classes to an existing application. If such payments are submitted with a TEAS response, the fee will be  $325 per class, and if such payments are made with a paper response, the fee will be $375 per class.

 

The new fee requirements will apply to any fees filed on or after January 31, 2005.

 

NOTICE:  TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATION

 

The Trademark Operation has relocated to Alexandria, Virginia.  Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

Applicants, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.

 

 

/Ann K. Linnehan/

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 114

571-272-9457

 

 

 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

You may respond formally using the Office's Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://eteas.gov.uspto.report/V2.0/oa242/WIZARD.htm and follow the instructions therein, but you must wait until at least 72 hours after receipt if the office action issued via e-mail).  PLEASE NOTE: Responses to Office Actions on applications filed under the Madrid Protocol (Section 66(a)) CANNOT currently be filed via TEAS.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.