Examiners Amendment Priority

GECKO

ABT HOLDING COMPANY

Examiners Amendment Priority

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/585362

 

    APPLICANT:         Athersys, Inc.

 

 

*76585362*

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

JOHN C. EISENHART

FLESHNER & KIM, LLP

P.O. BOX 221200

CHANTILLY, VIRGINIA 20153-1200

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:          GECKO

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   ATI-0035TM

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION

 

OFFICE SEARCH:  The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d).  TMEP section 704.02.   

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE.   This case will be given priority as an amended case if you respond to the requirements stated below within two months. 

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.

 

 

Serial Number 76/585362

 

EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT

 

In accordance with the authorization granted by John Eisenhart on October 27, 2004, the application has been AMENDED as indicated below.  If the identification of goods or services has been amended, please note that any future amendments must be in accordance with 37 C.F.R. 2.71(a); TMEP section 1402.07(e).  Please advise the undersigned if there is an objection to the amendment.   

 

Standard Character Claim

The following standard character drawing claim is added to the record:

 

The mark is presented in standard characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or color.

 

37 C.F.R. §2.52(a).

 

 

 

PRIORITY ACTION

 

 

Identification

 

THIS REQUIREMENT APPLIES TO CLASS 5 ONLY.

 

The wording “cells” in the identification of goods needs clarification because it does not specify whether or not they are for medical or clinical use and thereby classify them in class 005 or state that they are is for scientific, laboratory or medical research and classify them in class 001.  Applicant may adopt this wording: “cells for medical use which have genetic characteristics that render ... for dug modeling; cells for medical use as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of [specify i.e., cancer] in International Class 5.”

 

In addition, the wording “artificial genetic material for clinical and scientific uses” in the identification of goods needs clarification because it does not specify the nature of the material or its specific use.  Applicant must amend the identification of goods to specify the common commercial or generic name for the goods.  If there is no common commercial or generic name for the product, then applicant must describe the product and intended consumer as well as its main purpose and intended uses.  TMEP §1402.01.  Applicant may change this wording to “artificial genetic material for clinical use namely, {specify i.e., plasmids/ or single nucleotide polymorphisms or DNA fragments] that can be is inserted into cells and is reproduced upon cell division, for the clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic use for the treatment of cancer, in International Class 5” if accurate.  TMEP §1402.01.  Applicant should also specify whether the “genetic material” is for medical or clinical use and thereby classify it in class 5 or state that it is for scientific, laboratory or medical research and classify it in class 001. 

 

Please note that, while the identification of goods may be amended to clarify or limit the goods, adding to the goods or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.

 

For assistance with identifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the online searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services at http://tess2.gov.uspto.report/netahtml/tidm.html.

 

If applicant should fail to respond to this Office action within the six month time limit, then Class 5 will be deleted from the application and the application will proceed forward for Class 42 only.  37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).

 

 

Combined Application -_ITU

If applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple-class application, then applicant must comply with each of the following for those goods and/or services based on an intent to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b):

 

(1)   Applicant must list the goods and/or services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order.  TMEP § 1403.01; and

 

(2)   Applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods and/or services not covered by the fee already paid.  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.01 and 1403.01.

 

 

NOTICE:  TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATING OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 2004

 

The Trademark Operation is relocating to Alexandria, Virginia, in October and November 2004.  Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

Applicants, registration owners, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at www.uspto.gov.

 

 

/ Hellen M. Bryan-Johnson /

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 114

(571) 272-9446

fax (571) 273-9114

 

 

 

 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

You may respond formally using the Office's Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://eteas.gov.uspto.report/V2.0/oa242/WIZARD.htm and follow the instructions therein, but you must wait until at least 72 hours after receipt if the office action issued via e-mail).  PLEASE NOTE: Responses to Office Actions on applications filed under the Madrid Protocol (Section 66(a)) CANNOT currently be filed via TEAS.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed