UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
|
SERIAL NO: 76/583068
APPLICANT: EISAI CO., LTD.
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
|
|
MARK: ACIPHEX
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 61065/308873
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/583068
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
SEARCH OF THE OFFICE RECORDS
The trademark attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d). TMEP section 1105.01.
INFORMALITIES
Before the application can be considered further, the following informal issues must be addressed.
The nature of the goods is not clear from the present record. In order to allow proper identification and classification of the goods on which the applicant intends to use the mark, the applicant must submit samples of advertisements or promotional materials for goods of the same type. If such materials are not available, the applicant must submit a photograph of similar goods and must describe the nature, purpose and channels of trade of the goods on which the applicant has asserted a bona fide intent to use the mark. 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §§814 and 1402.01(d).
Trademark Rule 2.61(b) states "The examiner may require the applicant to furnish such information and exhibits as may be reasonably necessary to the proper examination of the application". The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has upheld a refusal of registration based on the applicant's failure to provide information requested under this rule. In re Babies Beat Inc., 13 USPQ2d 1729 (TTAB 1990)(failure to submit patent information regarding configuration).
The wording “SUBSTANCES” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant must amend the identification to specify the commercial name of the goods. If there is no common commercial name for the product, the applicant must describe the product and its intended uses. TMEP §1402.01.
In the identification, the applicant must use the common commercial names for the goods, be as complete and specific as possible and avoid the use of indefinite words and phrases. If the applicant chooses to use indefinite terms, such as “accessories,” “components,” “devices,” “equipment,” “materials,” “parts,” “systems” and “products,” then those words must be followed by the word “namely” and the goods listed by their common commercial names. TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03(a).
Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.
For assistance regarding an acceptable listing of goods and/or services, please see the on‑line searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services, at http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/offices/tac/doc/gsmanual/.
Applicant must submit a new drawing showing the entire mark clearly and conforming to 37 C.F.R. §§2.52. The current drawing is not acceptable because the depiction of the mark is unclear; the drawing is a photocopy of the mark that will not reproduce satisfactorily. TMEP §807.07(a). Specifically, the lettering and portions of the drawing are faint and will not photocopy.
Moreover, the applicant indicates that the mark is shown below in color, when, in fact, the mark is not in color. Finally, the applicant incorrectly claims color(s) as a feature of the mark. That is in black an white. If the applicant’s intent is to have a drawing in color, the applicant must submit a drawing that is in color. Furthermore, the applicant must comply with the color claim and color description requirements set forth below.
The requirements for a special-form drawing are as follows:
· The drawing must appear in black and white if color is not claimed as a feature of the mark, or in color if color is claimed as a feature of the mark.
· Drawings must be typed or made with a pen or by a process that will provide high definition when copied. A photolithographic, printer’s proof copy, or other high quality reproduction of the mark may be used. All lines must be clean, sharp and solid, and must not be fine or crowded.
· The image must be no larger than 3.15 inches (8 cm) high by 3.15 inches (8cm) wide.
· If reduction of the mark to the required size renders any details illegible, then applicant may insert a statement in the application to describe the mark and these details.
37 C.F.R. §§2.52(b); See TMEP §§807.01(b) and 807.07(a).
If submitted on paper, the Office prefers that the drawing be depicted on a separate sheet of non-shiny, white paper that is 8 to 8.5 inches wide and 11 to 11.69 inches long (20.3 to 21.6 cm. wide and 27.9 to 29.7 cm. long). One of the shorter sides of the sheet should be regarded as its top edge. In addition, the drawing should include the caption “DRAWING PAGE” at the top of the drawing beginning one-inch (2.5 cm) from the top edge. 37 C.F.R. §2.54.
The Office strictly enforces these drawing requirements.
Applicant must submit the following: (1) a statement that “the color(s) <specify> <is/are> claimed as a feature of the mark;” and (2) a separate description of where the colors appear in the mark, i.e., “the color(s) <name of color(s)> appear in <specify portion of the mark on which color(s) appear>.” 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b)(1). Common color names should be used to describe the colors in the mark, e.g., red, yellow, blue. Exam Guide 01-03, section I.B.1.
The applicant must indicate whether ACIPHEX has any significance in the relevant trade, any geographical significance or any meaning in a foreign language. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.61(b).
If the applicant is asserting §44(e) as a basis for registration (based on the foreign registration that will issue from the application that the applicant relied on for priority), the applicant must submit a true copy, a photocopy, a certification, or a certified copy of a foreign registration from the applicant’s country of origin. The applicant’s country of origin must either be a party to a convention or treaty relating to trademarks to which the United States is also a party, or must extend reciprocal registration rights to nationals of the United States by law. See TMEP §§1002.01, 1003.03 and 1004.
If the foreign certificate of registration is not written in English, the applicant must provide an English translation. The translator should sign the translation. See TMEP §§1004.01 and 1004.01(b).
NOTE:
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
NOTICE: TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATING OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 2004
The Trademark Operation is relocating to Alexandria, Virginia, in October and November 2004. Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:
Commissioner for Trademarks
P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
Applicants, registration owners, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at www.uspto.gov.
The USPTO Trademark Operations will be moving to the new Alexandria, Virginia campus in October and November 2004. During that time, you are strongly encouraged to communicate with the USPTO through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) which can be found at www.uspto.gov .
Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail must be sent to:
Commissioner for Trademarks
P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
My Law Office will move on November 2, 2004. To reach me by phone after that date call (571) 272-9337.
To submit a fax response to this Office action after that date, send your response to the Law Office fax number, namely (571) 273-9108.
/WILLIAM H. DAWE III/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 108
(703) 308-9108 ext. 294
(703) 746-8108 (Fax)
How to respond to this Office Action:
You may respond formally using the Office's Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://eteas.gov.uspto.report/V2.0/oa242/WIZARD.htm and follow the instructions therein, but you must wait until at least 72 hours after receipt if the office action issued via e-mail). PLEASE NOTE: Responses to Office Actions on applications filed under the Madrid Protocol (Section 66(a)) CANNOT currently be filed via TEAS.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.