Offc Action Outgoing

LAKESHORE

Lakeshore Inc.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/577723

 

    APPLICANT:                          Lakeshore Inc.

 

 

        

*76577723*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    RICHARD A. FLYNT

    ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN, L.L.P

    1300 19TH STREET, N.W. SUITE 600

    WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036

   

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3514

 

 

 

 

    MARK:          LAKESHORE

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   46382

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  76/577723

 

FIRST OFFICE ACTION

 

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.

 

Search of Office Records

 

The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d).  TMEP section 704.02.

 

Signed Declaration

 

The application must be signed, and verified or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20.  37 C.F.R. §2.33.  No signed verification or declaration was provided.  Therefore, the applicant must provide a signed verification or signed declaration attesting to the facts set forth in the application.

 

If the application is based on use in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. §1051(a), the verified statement must include an allegation that the mark is in use in commerce and was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the application filing date.  37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(1)(i); TMEP §§804.02, 806.01(a) and 901. 

 

If the application is based on Trademark Act Section 1(b) or 44, 15 U.S.C. §1051(b) or 1126, the verified statement must include an allegation that the applicant had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the application filing date.  37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(2)(i), 2.34(a)(3)(i) and 2.34(a)(4)(ii); TMEP §§804.02, 806.01(b), 806.01(c), 806.01(d) and 1101. 

 

Identification and Classification of Goods and Services

 

The identification of goods and services is unacceptable as indefinite.  Additionally, the applicant has failed to correctly classify the goods and services.  Accordingly, the applicant must amend the wording of the identification and the classification as indicated.  37 C.F.R. sections 2.32(a)(7) and 2.85; TMEP sections 1402.01, 1401.02(a) and 1401.03(b).

 

Potted plants, namely, tropical plants, plants in decorative containers, combination of plants in decorative containers, bedding plants, perennials, herbs, shrubs and nursery stock; dishgarden baskets, namely, a mixture of indoor green plants arranged in containers; flower bouquets and arrangements  – The applicant must amend this wording to indicate that these goods are “live.”

 

Wholesale distribution of flowers and plants – The applicant must amend this wording to “wholesale distributorship featuring” since the distribution of one’s own goods is not considered a service within the meaning of the Trademark Act.  Additionally, such services are in class 35.

 

Propagation of flowers and plants – The applicant must amend this wording to clarify the nature of the services, classifying them in class 44.

 

Operation of a greenhouse nursery – The applicant must amend this wording to clarify the nature of the services; if the applicant simply provides nursery services, this must be indicated and the services classified in class 44.

 

For example, the wording and classification may be amended as follows:

 

            CLASS 31:

-         fresh cut flowers; live potted plants, namely, tropical plants, plants in decorative containers, combination of plants in decorative containers, bedding plants, perennials, herbs, shrubs and nursery stock; dishgarden baskets, namely, a mixture of live indoor green plants arranged in containers; live flower bouquets and arrangements.

 

            CLASS 35:

-         wholesale distribution of distributorship featuring flowers and plants.

 

            CLASS 41:

-         wholesale distribution of flowers and plants; propagation of flowers and plants; operation of a greenhouse nursery.

 

            CLASS 44:

-         horticultural services, namely, propagation of flowers and plants; nursery services.

 

In the identification, the applicant must use the common commercial or generic names for the goods and services, be as complete and specific as possible, and avoid the use of indefinite words and phrases.  If applicant chooses to use indefinite terms such as "accessories," "components," "devices," "equipment," "materials," "parts," "systems" and "products," then such terms must be followed by the word "namely" and a list of the specific goods identified by their common commercial or generic names.  TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03(a).  Furthermore, with regard to services, if the applicant chooses to use indefinite words and phrases such as "services in connection with," "such as," "including," "and like services," "systems," "products," "concepts," or "not limited to," then such terms must be followed by the word "namely" and a list of the specific services identified by their common commercial or generic names.  TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03(a).

 

Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. Section 2.71(a); TMEP section 1402.06.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods or services that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.

 

The applicant must adopt the appropriate international classification number for the goods and services identified in the application.  The United States uses the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks, established by the World Intellectual Property Organization to classify goods and services.  37 C.F.R. §6.1; TMEP §§1401 et seq.

 

For assistance regarding an acceptable listing of goods and/or services, please see the on‑line searchable Manual of Acceptable Identifications of Goods and Services, at http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/offices/tac/doc/gsmanual/.

 

Requirements for a Multiple-Class Application

 

If the applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple‑class, application, the applicant must comply with each of the following.

 

(1)   The applicant must list the goods and/or services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order.  TMEP § 1403.01; and

 

(2)   The applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods and/or services not covered by the fee already paid.  37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.01 and 1403.01.

 

Meaning of the Mark

 

The applicant must indicate whether LAKESHORE has any significance in the relevant trade, any geographical significance or any meaning in a foreign language.  37 C.F.R. Section 2.61(b).

 


Application Filed under §§ 1(b) and 44(d)

 

The applicant has filed asserting a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. §1051(b), and claiming priority under Section 44(d), 15 U.S.C. §1126(d), based on a foreign application.  Under these circumstances, the applicant may rely solely on its intent to use the mark in commerce as the basis for registration and not the expected foreign registration, and still claim the benefit of the priority filing date.  If the applicant chooses to do so, this Office will approve the case for publication without waiting for the applicant to submit a certified copy of the foreign registration.  Of course, the application must be in condition for publication in all other respects.  Moreover, while the application may be approved for publication, the mark will not be registered until an acceptable allegation of use has been filed.

 

If the applicant wishes to proceed relying on the applicant’s intent to use the mark in commerce as the sole basis for registration, with the claim of priority, the applicant should so advise the examining attorney.  TMEP §§806.02(f) and 806.04(b).

 

If the applicant does not so indicate, this Office will presume that the applicant wishes to rely on the foreign registration as an additional basis for registration and will expect the applicant to submit the certification or certified copy of the foreign registration and, if appropriate, an English translation.  It is customary for the translator to sign the translation.  TMEP §§1004.01 and 1004.01(b).

 

Responding to This Office Action

 

No set form is required for response to this Office action.  The applicant must respond to each point raised.  The applicant should simply set forth the required changes or statements and request that the Office enter them.

 

If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

NOTICE:  TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATING OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER  2004

 

The Trademark Operation is relocating to Alexandria, Virginia, in October and November 2004.  Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

Applicants, registration owners, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at www.uspto.gov.

 

 

 

/Susan Kastriner Lawrence/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 116, (703) 306-7919

fax: (703) 746-8116

 

 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed