UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/563352
APPLICANT: Southampton Photonics Ltd.
|
*76563352* |
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: BRIAN M. DINGMAN MIRICK, O'CONNELL, DEMALLIE & LOUGEE 1700 WEST PARK DRIVE WESTBOROUCH. MA 01581-3941
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514
|
MARK: REDPOWER
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 16957-00010
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/563352
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
Search Results
The Office records have been searched and no similar registered or pending mark has been found that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
Identification of Goods/Services
The identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite because the nature of some of the goods in Class 9 is unclear. The identification of goods needs clarification because applicant uses the wording “APPARATUS” and “INSTRUMENTS”. The identification of goods must be specific and all-inclusive. Applicant should amend the identification to replace this wording with "namely." Please note that applicant may amend the identification to list only those items that are within the scope of the goods set forth in the application. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03(a). The applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate: TMEP §1402.01.
Class 9:
Lasers, optical amplifiers, electronic devices for providing a source of amplified spontaneous emission, telecommunications apparatus, namely, [specify item by common commercial name] and scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, [specify items by common commercial name], and all the aforesaid goods for use in welding, drilling, cutting, soldering, processing materials, telecommunications applications, aerospace applications, and defense applications.
Please note that, while the identification of goods may be amended to clarify or limit the goods, adding to the goods or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.
The identification for Class 10 is acceptable.
Option to Delete Basis
If applicant wishes to proceed relying on the applicant’s intent to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b) as the sole basis for registration, with the claim of priority under Section 44(d), then applicant should so advise the trademark examining attorney. TMEP §§806.02(f) and 806.04(b). If applicant chooses to do so, this Office will approve the mark for publication without waiting for applicant to submit a copy of the foreign registration, once all other outstanding issues are resolved. Moreover, while the application may be approved for publication, the mark will not register until after an acceptable allegation of use has been filed.
If applicant does not indicate otherwise, this Office will presume that applicant wishes to rely on the foreign registration as an additional basis for registration and will require applicant to submit the copy of the foreign registration and, if appropriate, an English translation signed by the translator. TMEP §§1004.01 and 1004.01(b).
Fee Increase
Fee increase effective January 1, 2003
Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing an application for trademark registration will be increased to $335.00 per International Class. The USPTO will not accord a filing date to applications that are filed on or after that date that are not accompanied by a minimum of $335.00.
Additionally, the fee for amending an existing application to add an additional class or classes of goods/services will be $335.00 per class for classes added on or after January 1, 2003.
Applicant may respond to this Office action using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) at <http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html>. When using TEAS the data the applicant submits is directly uploaded into the Office’s database, which reduces processing time and eliminates the possibility of data entry errors by the Office. Applicants are strongly encouraged to use TEAS to respond to Office actions. Applicants using TEAS should not submit a duplicate paper copy of the response.
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Karen Bracey/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 116
703-306-7914
703-746-8116 (fax)
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.