UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/555249
APPLICANT: DRUGTECH CORPORATION
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, L.L.P. |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks P.O. Box 1451 Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
|
MARK: CHRONOMETRIC SYSTEM
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 032058-242
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/555249
Responsive to the communication received on 11-12-04.
Applicant’s remarks have been considered.
The identification of goods is acceptable
As stated previously the mark merely describes a feature of the chronometric system for use in the time release of chemical, therapeutic and pharmaceutical substances in the human body for the treatment of illnesses, disorders and disease. “Chronometric” refers to the measurement of time as seen in the previously furnished Merriam- Webster on-line dictionary definition. As stated in the identification of goods applicant offers a chronometric system that measures the time for release of chemicals and substances into the body. It is not necessary that all the definitions of “chronometric” be satisfied as long as one of them describes a feature thereof as previously set forth.
The examining attorney must consider whether a mark is merely descriptive in relation to the identified goods/services, not in the abstract. In re Omaha National Corp., 819 F.2d 1117, 2 USPQ2d 1859 (Fed. Cir. 1987); In re Abcor Development Corp., 588 F.2d 811, 200 USPQ 215 (C.C.P.A. 1978); In re Venture Lending Associates, 226 USPQ 285 (TTAB 1985); In re American Greetings Corp., 226 USPQ 365 (TTAB 1985). TMEP §1209.01(b).
A term is suggestive if some imagination, thought or perception is required to determine the nature of the goods/services from the term. A suggestive term differs from a descriptive term, which immediately tells something about the goods/services. In re Aid Laboratories, Inc., 223 USPQ 357 (TTAB 1984). A suggestive mark is registrable on the Principal Register. TMEP §1209.01(a).
The fact that an applicant may be the first and only user of a merely descriptive or generic designation does not justify registration if the term is merely descriptive. In re National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc., 219 USPQ 1018 (TTAB 1983). TMEP §1209.03(c).
***Please note that the mark in an application under Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. §1051(b), is not eligible for registration on the Supplemental Register until an acceptable amendment to allege use under 37 C.F.R. §2.76 or statement of use under 37 C.F.R. §2.88 has been timely filed. 37 C.F.R. §2.47(c); TMEP §815.02, 816.02 and 1102.03. When such an application is changed from the Principal Register to the Supplemental Register, the effective filing date of the application is the date of filing of the allegation of use. 37 C.F.R. §2.75(b); TMEP §§206.01 and 816.02.
Applicant may respond to this final action by:
(1) submitting a response that fully satisfies all outstanding requirements, if feasible (37 C.F.R. §2.64(a)); and/or
(2) filing an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, with an appeal fee of $100 per class (37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(18) and 2.64(a); TMEP §§715.01 and 1501 et seq.; TBMP Chapter 1200).
In certain circumstances, a petition to the Director may be filed to review a final action that is limited to procedural issues, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(2). 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a). See 37 C.F.R. §2.146(b), TMEP §1704, and TBMP Chapter 1201.05 for an explanation of petitionable matter. The petition fee is $100. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(15).
NOTICE: TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATION
The Trademark Operation has relocated to Alexandria, Virginia. Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:
Commissioner for Trademarks
P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
Applicants, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.
/John C. Tingley/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 106
571-272-9334 fax 571-273-9106
6:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m
How to respond to this Office Action:
You may respond formally using the Office's Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://eteas.gov.uspto.report/V2.0/oa242/WIZARD.htm and follow the instructions therein, but you must wait until at least 72 hours after receipt if the office action issued via e-mail). PLEASE NOTE: Responses to Office Actions on applications filed under the Madrid Protocol (Section 66(a)) CANNOT currently be filed via TEAS.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.