Offc Action Outgoing

REMOTE RACKING SYSTEMS SAFE RACK

Remote Solutions, L.L.C.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/542069

 

    APPLICANT:                          Remote Solutions, L.L.C.

 

 

        

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    ANTONIO R. DURANDO

    DURANDO BIRDWELL & JANKE, P.L.C.

    2929 E. BROADWAY BLVD.

    TUCSON, AZ 85716

   

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3514

 

 

 

 

    MARK:          REMOTE RACKING SYSTEMS SAFE RACK

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   6202.005

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  76/542069

 

The wrong office action was previously sent to the applicant. Please ignore the previous office action. This is the correct action:

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following:

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS

 

The identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite because “related components” is too broad.  TMEP §1402.01. The applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate: 

 

Remote racking motors and related components, namely, [indicate other components by common commercial name],  for engaging and disengaging electrical power circuit breakers. International Class 7.

 

 

ADDITIONS TO IDENTIFCATION NOT PERMITTED

 

Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. 

 

Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.

 

DISCLAIMER

 

The applicant must insert a disclaimer of the wording REMOTE RACKING SYSTEMS and RACK in the application. Trademark Act Section 6, 15 U.S.C. Section 1056; TMEP section 1213.  The wording is merely descriptive because it describes a feature and type of the goods offered by the applicant.                                                        

 

The computerized printing format for the Trademark Official Gazette requires a standard form for a disclaimer.   TMEP section 1213.08(a)(i).  A properly worded disclaimer should read as follows:

 

            No claim is made to the exclusive right to use REMOTE RACKING SYSTEMS and RACK apart from the mark as shown.

 

See In re Owatonna Tool Co., 231 USPQ 493 (Comm'r Pats. 1983).

 

DESCRIPTION

 

The applicant must submit a concise description of the mark.  37 C.F.R. Section 2.37; TMEP section 808 et seq.  The statement may be in the following form:

 

The mark consists of _______________.

 

 

NO SIMILAR MARKS FOUND

 

The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d).  TMEP section 1105.01.

 

NOTICE - INCREASE IN TRADEMARK FILING FEE

 

Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing an application for trademark registration will be increased to $335.00 per International Class.  The USPTO will not accept applications that are filed on or after that date that are not accompanied by a minimum of $335.00.

 

Additionally, the fee for amending an existing application to add an additional class or classes of goods/services will be $335.00 per class.

 

A Final Rule amending the Rules of Practice in Trademark Cases to provide for this fee increase was published in the Federal Register on November 27, 2002 (67 Fed. Reg. 70,847 (2002)).

 

If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

                        /Dezmona J. Mizelle-Howard/

Dezmona J. Mizelle-Howard

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 110

703.308.9110, ext. 259

703.746.6203  [Fax]

 

 

 

 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.

 

 

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed