KETO BETTER THAN RICE
Keto, L.l.c.
Mark For: KETO BETTER THAN RICE™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 76541577 |
| Mark Literal Elements | KETO BETTER THAN RICE |
| Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
| Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
| Standard Character Claim | No |
| Register | PRINCIPAL |
| Current Location | INTENT TO USE SECTION 2010-05-18 |
| Basis | 1(b) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | No |
| Current Use | No |
| Intent To Use | Yes |
| Filed ITU | Yes |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Attorney Name | Catherine M. Clayton |
| Law Office Assigned | M20 |
| Employee Name | FISHER, HANNAH M |
Timeline
| 2003-08-19 | Application Filed |
| 2004-06-22 | Published |
| 2004-06-22 | Published for Opposition |
| 2010-05-18 | Location: INTENT TO USE SECTION |
| 2010-12-20 | Abandon |
| 2010-12-20 | Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all docume |
| 2010-12-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  KETO, L.L.C. |
| Address | 3535 ROUTE 66 NEPTUNE, NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES 07753 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | NEW JERSEY |
Documents
 Application | 2003-08-19 | |
| Drawing | 2003-08-19 | |
| XSearch Search Summary | 2003-10-23 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2003-10-26 | |
| XSearch Search Summary | 2003-10-26 | |
| Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2003-11-24 | |
| Examiners Amendment | 2004-04-08 | |
| Notice of Publication | 2004-06-02 | |
| TEAS Rev, App and/or COA of Atty/Dom.Rep | 2007-12-11 | |
| Notice of Allowance | 2010-05-18 | |
| Notice of Abandonment | 2010-12-20 | |
| ITU Unit Action | 2010-12-21 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
(ABANDONED)
IC 030. US 046. G & S: Rice substitute
| International Codes: | 30 |
| U.S. Codes: | 046 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "better than rice" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2010-12-20 | |
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2010-12-20 | 99999 |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2010-05-18 | |
| TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | 2010-04-08 | 163407 |
| OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2010-04-08 | 163407 |
| OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | 2010-04-08 | 163407 |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-12-11 | |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-12-11 | |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2004-12-14 | 163407 |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2004-07-23 | |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2004-06-22 | |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2004-06-02 | |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2004-04-15 | |
| EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | 2004-04-09 | |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-11-24 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-11-24 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-10-26 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-10-21 | 59851 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 