UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/535521
APPLICANT: Ebel Entertainment
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514
|
MARK: REGGAETON
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: N/A
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/535521
This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on April 28, 2004. In the first Office action, the applicant was required to amend the drawing of the mark, provide the state of incorporation, amend the identification of goods, clarify the number of classes applied for and indicate the significance of the wording in the mark. The applicant responded by providing the state of incorporation, amending the identification of goods, clarifying the number of classes applied-for and indicating the significance of the wording in the mark. In addition, the applicant’s response included a proposed amendment of the name of the entity that is applying.
The requirements to provide the state of incorporation, amend the identification of goods, clarify the number of classes applied for, and indicate the significance of the wording in the mark have been fulfilled and are herein withdrawn. However, the applicant’s response did not include an acceptable drawing showing only one mark. For that reason, the drawing requirement is maintained and continued. In addition, the proposed change to the applicant’s name raises a new issue, which is addressed below.
In the first Office action, the examining attorney indicated that the original drawing of the mark depicts three different representations of REGGAETON. The applicant may only register ONE mark. The original drawing shows three marks. For that reason, the applicant must choose, and submit one representation of the mark.
The applicant’s response included a proposed change of the entity that is applying for the mark. The proposed name change is not acceptable for the following reason. While an application can be amended to correct an inadvertent error in the manner in which an applicant’s name is set forth (see TMEP §1201.02(c)), an application cannot be amended to substitute another entity as the applicant. If the application was filed in the name of a party who had no basis for his or her assertion of ownership of (or entitlement to use) the mark as of the filing date, the application is void, and registration must be refused. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §1201.02(b). Huang v. Tzu Wei Chen Food Co. Ltd., 849 F.2d 1458, 7 USPQ2d 1335 (Fed. Cir. 1988); American Forests v. Sanders, 54 USPQ2d 1860 (TTAB 1999), aff’d, 232 F.3d 907 (Fed. Cir. 2000); In re Tong Yang Cement Corp., 19 USPQ2d 1689 (TTAB 1991); In re Lettmann, 183 USPQ 369 (TTAB 1974); Dunleavy v. Koeppel Steel Products, Inc., 114 USPQ 43 (Comm’r Pats. 1957), aff’d, 328 F.2d 939, 140 USPQ 582 (C.C.P.A. 1964); Richardson Corp. v. Richardson, 51 USPQ 144 (Comm’r Pats. 1941); Celanese Corporation of America v. Edwin Crutcher, 35 USPQ 98 (Comm’r Pats. 1937). The Office will not refund the application filing fee in such a case.
No set form is required for response to this Office action. The applicant must respond to each point raised. The applicant should simply set forth the required changes or statements and request that the Office enter them. The applicant must sign the response and include the identifying information required at the beginning of this letter.
NOTICE: TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATING OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 2004
The Trademark Operation is relocating to Alexandria, Virginia, in October and November 2004. Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:
Commissioner for Trademarks
P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
Applicants, registration owners, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at www.uspto.gov.
/Pamela Y. Willis/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 106
(703) 308-9106 ext. 126
(703) 746-8106 (FAX)
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.