UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/527298
APPLICANT: Spina Bifida Association of America
|
*76527298* |
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: DOUGLAS J. SOROCCO DUNLAP, CODDING & ROGERS, P.C. P.O. BOX 16370 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73113
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514
|
MARK: INSIGHTS
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 7404.008
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/527298
This Office action responds to the applicant’s correspondence received 5/3/04. Upon review of the substitute specimen of use, the examining attorney notes the following:
The applicant responded with substitute specimens that use the proposed mark, but again, not for the identified services [association services, namely, promoting the interests of people with spina bifida]. Accordingly, the requirement to submit acceptable specimens of use for the identified services is maintained and FINAL.
Applicant must submit (1) a substitute specimen showing the mark as it is used in commerce in the sale or advertising of the services, and (2) a statement that “the substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application,” verified with a notarized affidavit or a signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. 37 C.F.R. §§2.56 and 2.59(a); TMEP §904.09.
In its response to the requirement to submit an acceptable substitute specimen, the applicant submitted various pages and articles from its newsletter, an annual report, and an exhibitor’s prospectus.
The original specimen of use comprised a newsletter of the applicant entitled Insights Into Spina Bifida.
Each of the submitted substitute specimens [Exhibits A-AA] references Insights, the applicant’s newsletter. The applicant’s submitted specimens are unacceptable as evidence of proper service mark use because they fail to show use of the proposed mark in connection with the identified services [association services, namely, promoting the interests of people with spina bifida].
A service mark specimen must show the mark as actually used in the sale or advertising of the services recited in the application. 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(2). Examples of acceptable specimens for services are signs, photographs, brochures, website printouts or advertisements that show the mark used in the sale or advertising of the services. TMEP §§1301.04 et seq.
Accordingly, the examining attorney continues and maintains the FINAL refusal regarding acceptable substitute specimens of use.
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are either (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, or (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.64(a). If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.65(a).
/R.L.F./
Ronald L. Fairbanks
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 112
(703)308-9112 ext. 137
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.