Change of Address

SOLITE

Designed Nutritional Products, Inc.

Change Of Correspondence Address

The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field	Entered
SERIAL NUMBER	76526080
REGISTRATION NUMBER	2838300
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED	LAW OFFICE 106
MARK SECTION
MARK	SOLITE
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current)
ORIGINAL ADDRESS	RICHARD L HILL Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C. 4844 North 300 West, Suite 300 Provo Utah 84604-5663 US 801-375-6600 ipmail@djplaw.com;bschott@djplaw.com
NEW CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
NEW ADDRESS	Durham Jones & Pinegar, P.C. 4844 North 300 West, Suite 300 Provo Utah United States 84604-5663 801-375-6600 ipmail@djplaw.com;PVTrademarks@djplaw.com; bschott@djplaw.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA E-MAIL	YES
SIGNATURE SECTION
SIGNATURE	/Richard L Hill/
SIGNATORY NAME	Richard L. Hill
SIGNATORY DATE	12/17/2013
SIGNATORY POSITION	Attorney of Record/Member of UT Bar
SIGNATORY PHONE NUMBER	801-375-6600
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY	YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE	Tue Dec 17 16:41:15 EST 2013
TEAS STAMP	USPTO/CCA-XXX.XXX.XX.XXX- 20131217164115237923-7652 6079-50086d9be166c1f9ef7f b0d43de654e8f3b97edca87c3 7b083266d139dd2b90f4-N/A- N/A-20131217163742827185

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.