UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/516123
APPLICANT: E Street Denim Co.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: STEVEN R. GURSKY GURSKY & EDERER, LLP 1350 BROADWAY -11TH FLOOR NEW YORK NY 10018
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom106@uspto.gov
|
MARK: RADIO
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: ES003 USA A2
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/516123
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion Refusal
The examining attorney refuses registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d), because the applicant’s mark, when used on or in connection with the identified goods/services, so resembles the mark in U.S. Registration No. 1,472,385 as to be likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive. TMEP §§1207.01 et seq. See the enclosed registration.
Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act bars registration where a mark so resembles a registered mark, that it is likely, when applied to the goods/services, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake or to deceive. TMEP §1207.01. The Court in In re E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (C.C.P.A. 1973), listed the principal factors to consider in determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion. Among these factors are the similarity of the marks as to appearance, sound, meaning and commercial impression and the similarity of the goods/services. The overriding concern is to prevent buyer confusion as to the source of the goods/services. Miss Universe, Inc. v. Miss Teen U.S.A., Inc., 209 USPQ 698 (N.D. Ga. 1980). Therefore, any doubt as to the existence of a likelihood of confusion must be resolved in favor of the registrant. Lone Star Mfg. Co. v. Bill Beasley, Inc., 498 F.2d 906, 182 USPQ 368 (C.C.P.A. 1974).
The examining attorney also encloses information regarding pending Application Serial No. 76-506835. 37 C.F.R. §2.83.
There may be a likelihood of confusion between the applicant’s mark and the mark in the above noted application under Section 2(d) of the Act. The filing date of the referenced application precedes the applicant’s filing date. If the earlier‑filed application matures into a registration, the examining attorney may refuse registration under Section 2(d).
All the involved marks are dominated by the term “RADIO” and involve clothing items that are either identical or closely related. Although the cited registration and application contain other material the following should be noted.
While the examining attorney cannot ignore descriptive or disclaimed matter or a design feature of a mark and must view marks in their entireties, one feature of a mark may be more significant in creating a commercial impression. Tektronix, Inc. v. Daktronics, Inc., 534 F.2d 915, 189 USPQ 693 (CCPA 1976); In re El Torito Restaurants Inc., 9 USPQ2d 2002 (TTAB 1988); In re Equitable Bancorporation, 229 USPQ 709 (TTAB 1986). Disclaimed matter is typically less significant or less dominant. All England Lawn Tennis Club (Wimbledon) Ltd. v. Creations Aromatiques, Inc. 220 USPQ 1069 (TTAB 1984) (WIMBLEDON COLOGNE and tennis player design, for cologne, and WIMBLEDON for clothing, would be likely to cause confusion); Marcon, Ltd. v. Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc. 221 USPQ 644 (TTAB 1984) (BLUE SILK and GARNET SILK were held similar to SILK for eye shadow).
Applicant may either file an argument in favor of registration at this time or request that the application be suspended pending the outcome of the earlier filed application before filing an argument.
/Paul F. Gast/
Examining Attorney, L. O. 106
(703) 435-3391 ext. 297 main
(703) 308-9106 ext. 297 alternate
(703) 746-8106 LO 106 FAX
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.