UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/513567
APPLICANT: Agropur Cooperative
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: STEPHEN J. JEFFRIES HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. SUITE 100 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom102@uspto.gov
|
MARK: CHILL IT WHEN YOU WANT IT!
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 072984.00003
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/513567
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d). TMEP section 1105.01.
Application Filed Pursuant to 1(b) and 44(d)
The applicant has filed asserting a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. Section 1051(b), and claiming priority under Section 44(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1126(d), based on a foreign application. Under these circumstances, the applicant may rely solely on its intent to use the mark in commerce as the basis for registration and not the expected foreign registration, and still claim the benefit of the priority filing date. If the applicant chooses to do so, this Office will approve the case for publication without waiting for the applicant to submit a certified copy of the foreign registration. Of course, the application must be in condition for publication in all other respects. Moreover, while the application may be approved for publication, the mark will not be registered until an acceptable allegation of use has been filed.
If the applicant wishes to proceed relying on the applicant's intent to use the mark in commerce as the sole basis for registration, with the claim of priority, the applicant should so advise the examining attorney. If the applicant does so, the applicant may not subsequently rely on the foreign registration. TMEP section 1006.01.
If the applicant does not so indicate, this Office will presume that the applicant wishes to rely on the foreign registration as an additional basis for registration and will expect the applicant to submit the certification or certified copy of the foreign registration and, if appropriate, an English translation. It is customary for the translator to sign the translation.
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Michael Webster/
Michael Webster
Examining Attorney
USPTO Law Office 102
(703) 308-9102 ext. 220
ecom102@uspto.gov (formal response)
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.