UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
|
SERIAL NO: 76/510642
APPLICANT: McDermid Paper Converters Limited
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: HOWARD NATTER NATTER & NATTER 25 WEST 43 STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036-7469
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom112@uspto.gov
|
|
MARK: RAINCOAT
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: N/A
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/510642
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
SEARCH
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(d). TMEP section 1105.01.
The identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite because the exact nature of the goods is unclear. The applicant must amend the identification to specify the common commercial name of the goods. If there is no common commercial name for the product, the applicant must describe the product and its intended uses. TMEP §1402.01.
The applicant may adopt the following identification of goods, if accurate:
Rolls of printing paper; writing paper sheets, paper tapes for printing or for use in a variety of business and office machines; paper labels; paper note pads; paper for making printed tickets, in International Class 16.
Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.
APPLICATION UNDER 1(B) AND 44(D)
The applicant has filed asserting a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. §1051(b), and claiming priority under Section 44(d), 15 U.S.C. §1126(d), based on a foreign application. Under these circumstances, the applicant may rely solely on its intent to use the mark in commerce as the basis for registration and not the expected foreign registration, and still claim the benefit of the priority filing date. If the applicant chooses to do so, this Office will approve the case for publication without waiting for the applicant to submit the foreign registration. Of course, the application must be in condition for publication in all other respects. Moreover, while the application may be approved for publication, the mark will not be registered until an acceptable allegation of use has been filed.
If the applicant wishes to proceed relying on the applicant’s intent to use the mark in commerce as the sole basis for registration, with the claim of priority, the applicant should so advise the examining attorney. TMEP §§806.02(f) and 806.04(b).
If the applicant does not so indicate, this Office will presume that the applicant wishes to rely on the foreign registration as an additional basis for registration and will expect the applicant to submit a true copy, a photocopy, a certification, or a certified copy of the foreign registration and, if appropriate, an English translation. It is customary for the translator to sign the translation. TMEP §§1004.01 and 1004.01(b).
Scott Baldwin /sb/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 112
703-308-9112 x124
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.