Offc Action Outgoing

INDUCTION SYSTEM CLEANER

BG Products, Inc.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/510054

 

    APPLICANT:                          BG Products, Inc.

 

 

        

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    CLINTON G. NEWTON

    SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.

    ONE KANSAS CITY PLACE

    1200 MAIN STREET

    KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64105-2118

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3514

 

 

 

 

    MARK:          INDUCTION SYSTEM CLEANER

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   BGPI.105311

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

The Office has reassigned this application to the undersigned examining attorney.

 

This letter responds to the applicant's communication filed on March 15, 2004.  As a new issue was raised by the claim of acquired distinctiveness, this action is non-final.

 

Five Years’ Use Insufficient to Establish Distinctiveness

The mark in this application was refused registration on the grounds that it is descriptive of the goods, namely, “fuel injection cleaner chemical additive.”  The applicant has claimed that the mark has acquired distinctiveness based on at least five years of substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce. 

 

The amount and character of evidence needed to establish acquired distinctiveness depends on the facts of each case and particularly on the nature of the mark sought to be registered.  See Roux Laboratories, Inc. v. Clairol Inc., 427 F.2d 823, 166 USPQ 34 (C.C.P.A. 1970); In re Hehr Mfg. Co., 279 F.2d 526, 126 USPQ 381 (C.C.P.A. 1960); In re Gammon Reel, Inc., 227 USPQ 729 (TTAB 1985).  More evidence is needed where a mark is so highly descriptive that purchasers seeing the matter in relation to the named goods and/or services would be less likely to believe that it indicates source in any one party.  See, e.g., In re Bongrain International Corp., 894 F.2d 1316, 13 USPQ2d 1727 (Fed. Cir. 1990); In re Seaman & Associates, Inc., 1 USPQ2d 1657 (TTAB 1986); In re Packaging Specialists, Inc., 221 USPQ 917 (TTAB 1984).  However, no amount of purported proof that a generic term has acquired secondary meaning can transform that term into a registrable trademark.  Such a designation cannot become a trademark under any circumstances.  See Miller Brewing Co. v. G. Heileman Brewing Co., 561 F.2d 75, 195 USPQ 281 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1025, 196 USPQ 592 (1978).

 

Additional evidence is needed to support the claim of distinctiveness here.  Applicant’s allegation of five years’ use alone is insufficient evidence of distinctiveness in this case because applicant’s mark is highly descriptive of the goods and/or services.  TMEP §1212.05(a).  In re Kalmbach Publishing Co., 14 USPQ2d 1490 (TTAB 1989).

 

Applicant must establish acquired distinctiveness by a preponderance of the evidence.  Yamaha Int’l Corp. v. Hoshino Gakki Co., 840 F.2d 1572, 6 USPQ2d 1001 (Fed. Cir. 1988).  This evidence may include specific dollar sales under the mark, advertising figures, samples of advertising, consumer or dealer statements of recognition of the mark, and any other evidence that establishes the distinctiveness of the mark as an indicator of source.  The Office will decide each case on its own merits.

 

If additional evidence is submitted, the following factors will be considered when assessing its sufficiency:  (1) how long applicant has used the mark; (2) the type and amount of advertising of the mark; and (3) applicant’s efforts to associate the mark with the goods and/or services.  See Ralston Purina Co. v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc., 341 F. Supp. 129, 173 USPQ 820 (S.D.N.Y. 1972); In re Packaging Specialists, Inc., 221 USPQ 917 (TTAB 1984); 37 C.F.R. §2.41; TMEP §§1212, 1212.01 and 1212.06 et seq.

 

Attached to this action are some articles drawn from the Lexis®/Nexis® database as well as Internet search evidence which support the argument that INDUCTION SYSTEM CLEANER for “fuel injection cleaner chemical additive” is highly descriptive or generic.

 

Accordingly, the refusal under Section 2(e)(1) is maintained and continued.  As the refusal of the mark as a whole based on descriptiveness is continued, the disclaimer of “CLEANER” is noted but not accepted unless and until the claim of acquired distinctiveness is effected.

 

 

 

 

/Heather D. Thompson/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 103

703.308.9103 ext. 223 [phone]

703.746.8103 [fax]

 

 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.

 

                                                                         108B8C

Print Request:   Selected Document(s): 1,2

                 

Time of Request: April 21, 2004  12:51 PM EDT

 

Number of Lines: 66

Job Number:      1822:0:13969444

 

Client ID/Project Name: 

 

Research Information:

 

 News,  All (English,  Full Text)

"induction system cleaner

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Send to:  THOMPSON, HEATHER

          TRADEMARK LAW LIBRARY

          2101 CRYSTAL PLAZA ARC

          MAILBOX 314

          ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-4600

          

          



 

 


1 of 2 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2000 Information Access Company,

a Thomson Corporation Company;

 ASAP

Copyright 2000 Advanstar Communications, Inc. 

Aftermarket Business

 

February 1, 2000

 

 

 


SECTION: Pg. 37 ; ISSN: 0892-1121

 

IAC-ACC-NO: 59733464

 

LENGTH: 91 words

 

HEADLINE: Induction system cleaner; Brief Article

 

BODY:

 Wynn's Oil Company introduces its Induction System Cleaning Kit that provides simple, but preventative maintenance service of induction systems. It gives the user flexibility to clean the complete fuel system and EGR (exhaust gas recirculation) passageways; features color- coded EGR adapter plates for servicing a wide variety of vehicles; and allows for simultaneous or separate applications of Wynn's Fuel System products with the flexibility for product application using engine vacuum or pressure provided by shop air.

 Circle 264

 

IAC-CREATE-DATE: April 17, 2000

 

LOAD-DATE: April 18, 2000


 

 


 

 


2 of 2 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 1997 Newsday, Inc. 

 Newsday (New York)

 

November 8, 1997, Saturday, NASSAU AND SUFFOLK EDITION

 

 

 


SECTION: PART II; Page B23

 

LENGTH: 333 words

 

HEADLINE: CARS

 

BYLINE: By Bob Sikorsky

 

BODY:

Q. My 1994 Lincoln Mark performs beautifully. The dealer is trying to sell me an induction-system cleaning for $109. Is such a service worthwhile?

A. In my opinion, it's not.

Your car, by your statement, is performing "beautifully," and you are no doubt using a high-grade, high-detergent, "clean" gasoline, one that already has some type of induction-system cleaner as part of its additive package. To me, it would be a waste of money to clean a system that is probably already clean.

Keep using quality gasoline, and you shouldn't need any type of induction cleaning.

Read on for more on gasoline.

Q. I have a 1991 Cadillac, and I am using premium gasoline because that is what my owner's manual says to do.

I have friends who tell me that I am wasting money by using premium. My friends indicate that the car manufacturers are in cahoots with the oil companies.

Should I put regular gas in the car and ignore the owner's manual?

A. Some friends you have.

Do those same friends tell you that in many other owner's manuals, the manufacturer recommends regular gasoline instead of premium? Nah, I bet they don't.

Premium is specified for a purpose: The car runs better with it, and the engine will last longer using it. Especially now that your car is almost seven years old, you would notice a distinct difference in the way it runs if you switched to regular.

Remember, as I've said many times in this space, as cars age, they require more octane - not less, as your friends suggest - to give comparable performance.

Q. We recently acquired a 1990 Buick Century with 52,000 miles. The car runs beautifully, but the only problem is that the motor has a whine in it when it is running.

We hope you can tell us what causes the whine.

A. I don't mean to whine, but I need more information other than that your engine whines.

Questions or comments of general interest can be addressed to Bob Sikorsky, c/o Newsday, 235 Pinelawn Rd., Melville, N.Y. 11747-4250.

 

LOAD-DATE: November 8, 1997


 

 

                                                                         108B8C

Print Request:   Selected Document(s): 1,10,11,14,15,19,21,24,26,30

                 

Time of Request: April 21, 2004  12:49 PM EDT

 

Number of Lines: 230

Job Number:      1822:0:13969036

 

Client ID/Project Name: 

 

Research Information:

 

 News,  All (English,  Full Text)

"induction system" w/10 ("fuel injection" or "fuel injector")

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Send to:  THOMPSON, HEATHER

          TRADEMARK LAW LIBRARY

          2101 CRYSTAL PLAZA ARC

          MAILBOX 314

          ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-4600

          

          



 

 


1 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2004 Grand Forks Herald

All Rights Reserved 

  Grand Forks Herald

 

March 21, 2004 Sunday

 

 

 


SECTION: LOC

 

LENGTH: 139 words

 

HEADLINE: Keep your car on the road with preventive maintenance

 

BODY:

...your tires rotated every 6,000 to 10,000 miles.

- Tune up your car regularly. Replace long-life spark plugs at 35,000 to 40,000 miles, and change or clean the fuel filter, fuel injectors and induction system every 24,000 to 30,000 miles.


 

 


 

 


10 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2004 by PRIMEDIA Business Magazines & Media Inc.

"All Rights Reserved"  

 Ward's Auto World

 

January 1, 2004

 

 

 


SECTION: ISSN: 50; Pg. 1

 

LENGTH: 8914 words

 

HEADLINE: A Decade of 10 Best

 

BODY:

...related bugaboos, which primarily were related to emissions and fuel economy.

The "High-Power" version of the Renesis is differentiated from the standard-power version that generates 197 hp by virtue of a more-complex variable-tract induction system, three rather than two fuel injectors per rotor and an elaborate intake port design that incorporates an extra port governed by a rotating valve that Mazda engineers say effectively amounts to variable valve timing for ...

 

LOAD-DATE: January 12, 2004


 

 


 

 


11 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2003 Post-Standard, All Rights Reserved. 

 The Post-Standard (Syracuse, NY)

 

November 30, 2003 Sunday

 

 

 


SECTION: AUTO; Pg. G1

 

LENGTH: 539 words

 

HEADLINE: ROUTINE WORK CAN HELP PASS INSPECTION

 

BYLINE: RICK KENT CONTRIBUTING WRITER

 

BODY:

In other cases, problems with the exhaust gas re-circulation valve or evaporative emissions system will require additional services. Many problems stemming from carbon buildup in the fuel injection and air induction system can be avoided if a regular maintenance plan is followed.

Routinely adding a bottle of fuel injector cleaner to a full tank of gas every oil change will help minimize carbon ...


 

 


 

 


14 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2003 The Charlotte Observer

All Rights Reserved 

Charlotte Observer (North Carolina)

 

September 2, 2003 Tuesday ONE-THREE EDITION

 

 

 


SECTION: MAIN; News2Use. Your Guide to Everday Life - DRIVING; Pg. 2A

 

LENGTH: 207 words

 

HEADLINE: TO SCORE EXTRA SAVINGS, KEEP THAT OLD CAR IN SHAPE

 

BYLINE: KNIGHT RIDDER, SOURCE: WWW.CARS.COM

 

BODY:

...inspected with each oil change.

Tune it up - before 100,000 miles. Long-life spark plugs should be replaced at 35,000 to 40,000 miles and certainly at 60,000 miles. The fuel filter, fuel injectors and induction system should be changed or cleaned every 2-3 years or 24,000 to 30,000 miles.

"I sent two daughters through college and graduate school in high-mileage vehicles and have a 13-year-old ...


 

 


 

 


15 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2003 Micromedia Limited

Canadian Business and Current Affairs

Copyright 2003 Business Information Group, Rogers Publishing Ltd. 

PurchasingB2B

 

September, 2003

 

 

 


SECTION: S'03; ISSN: 0008-3917

 

CBCA-ACC-NO: 5860040

 

LENGTH: 809 words

 

HEADLINE: Power plant: Ford's new power stroke 6L diesel (Record in progress)

 

BYLINE: Elmer, Howard J

 

BODY:

...Four valves per cylinder, hydraulic roller

Displacement: 363 cubic inches / 5,924 cc Bore: 3.74 inches / 95.0 mm

Stroke: 4.13 inches / 105.0 mm Compression Ratio: 18:0:1 Fuel Injection:

Hydraulic rail fuel injection Induction System: EVRTTM

electronically-controlled turbocharger Emission Controls:

Electronically-controlled exhaust-gas recirculation Transmission:

Five-speed TorqShift automatic Towing Capacity: 20,000-pound max gross

combined weight of vehicle and ...


 

 


 

 


19 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2003 The Indianapolis Star

All Rights Reserved 

The Indianapolis Star

 

August 1, 2003 Friday Final Edition

 

 

 


SECTION: SPECIAL SECTION; Pg. 2R

 

LENGTH: 700 words

 

HEADLINE: Dissecting a Winston Cup car

 

BODY:

...Carburetor

Passenger Pontiac Grand Prix

Chassis Design: Front-wheel drive

Type: Unitized body

Steering: Rack-and-pinion

Engine Type: 3800 V6

Horsepower: 200 hp @ 5,200 rpm

Induction System: Fuel injection

__________________________________________

Aerodynamics and drafting

Aerodynamics, the way air flows over the car, plays an important role at the larger racetracks. This is where drafting becomes important. Drafting is sort of like driving behind a semi- ...


 

 


 

 


21 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2003 Gale Group, Inc.

ASAP

Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information 

Automotive Industries

 

July 1, 2003

 

 

 


SECTION: No. 7, Vol. 183; Pg. 42; ISSN: 1099-4130

 

IAC-ACC-NO: 105659484

 

LENGTH: 1667 words

 

HEADLINE: Minivan redefined: Nissan seeks to change minivan basics with its new Quest; Product; Product/Service Evaluation

 

BYLINE: Wielgat, Andrea

 

BODY:

...Horsepower: 240 @ 5,800 RPM

 Torque: 242 ft-lbs. @4,400 rpm

 Bore & Stroke (mm): 95.5 x 81.4.

 Compression ratio (:1): 10.3

 Maximum engine speed: 6,500 rpm

 Induction system: sequential multi-point electronic fuel injection

 Valvetrain: 4-valves per cylinder CVTC

 Engine mounts: electronically controlled

 Emissions certification level: LEV2/LEV emission standards

 Emission system: Oxygen sensor, catalyzer

 Exhaust: Singe tailpipe ...


 

 


 

 


24 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2003 New Mexican, Inc. 

Santa Fe New Mexican (New Mexico)

 

March 8, 2003 Saturday

 

 

 


SECTION: CARS AND TRUCKS; Pg. E-1

 

LENGTH: 756 words

 

HEADLINE: INSURGENT RACER

 

BYLINE: BARRY WINFIELD

 

BODY:

...an amazing array of new features, including new 41mm inverted Kayaba forks and radial-mount front disc brakes, both unique in the 600 segment. The ZX-6s also feature electronic fuel injection with a new centrally located ram-air system to pressurize the bike's induction system and lightweight LED taillights.

As usual in this class, great care was taken to pare ounces off the machine's weight. The new ZX-6R has shorter cylinders and cylinder heads than last year, plus shorter ...


 

 


 

 


26 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2003 The Tribune Co. Publishes The Tampa Tribune 

Tampa Tribune (Florida)

 

February 9, 2003, Sunday, FINAL EDITION

 

 

 


SECTION: SPECIAL SPORTS, Pg. 3

 

LENGTH: 752 words

 

HEADLINE: Nascar Preview

 

BODY:

...16 in. x 6.5 in. 15 in. x 9.5 in.

Tires: P225/60R16 28 x 12.00 x 15 in.

Engine

Type: 3800 V6 5.7L V8

Induction system: Fuel injection 830 cfm 4-barrel

Horsepower: 240 hp @5,200 rpm 715 hp @7,800 rpm

Transmission

Type: 4-speed automatic 4-speed manual

Capacities

Fuel system: 18.0 ...


 

 


 

 


30 of 140 DOCUMENTS

 

Copyright 2002 Contra Costa Times

All Rights Reserved 

Contra Costa Times (California)

 

July 19, 2002 Friday

 

 

 


SECTION: F; Pg. 4

 

LENGTH: 526 words

 

HEADLINE: Some maintenance not listed in manual is good for car;

AUTO PLUS

 

BYLINE: KNIGHT RIDDER NEWSPAPERS

 

BODY:

...makes no mention, and the dealer did not recommend its use. I would rather use synthetic.

Howard Lee, San Jose, Calif.

A I'm all for taking good care of machinery, but fuel-injector and induction-system cleaning every 30,000 miles is a bit rich for my blood unless the vehicle has high mileage or runs poorly.

Same with packing the wheel bearings. This job was specified on older Mazda ...


 

 

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed