UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/503090
APPLICANT: SICPA Holding, S,A.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: JODY H. DRAKE SUGHRUE MION, PLLC 2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, DC 20037
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom116@uspto.gov
|
MARK: SICPATALK
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: S7456
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/503090
This letter responds to the applicant's communication filed on December 15, 2003. The applicant (1) amended the identification of goods and recitation of services, (2) deleted Class 40, (3) submitted copy of the foreign registration and (4) deleted Section 1(b).
The proposed amendment to the identification of goods, the deletion of Class 40, the deletion of Section 1(b), and the foreign certificate are acceptable.
The proposed amendment to the recitation of services and the classification of the services is unacceptable.
The requirement to amend the recitation of services and to reclassify the services is continued and made FINAL.
Recitation of Services
The proposed amendment to the identification cannot be accepted because the wording "security printing and marking services, namely, branding, inscribing, labeling and encoding valuable documents and products with identification information, namely, security taggants, markings, coatings and compositions, to prevent and/or impede counterfeiting, forgery and fraud" refers to services that are not within the scope of the identification that was set forth in the application at the time of filing. While the identification of services may be amended to clarify or limit the services, additions to the identification or a broadening of the scope of the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06 et seq. and 1402.07. Therefore, this wording should be deleted from the identification.
The applicant has classified the services in International Class 42. The correct classification is International Class 45. The applicant must reclassify the services in International Class 45. 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7) and 2.85; TMEP §1401.04(b).
Options
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or (3) filing of a petition to the Director if permitted by 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b). 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §715.01. Regarding petitions to the Director, see 37 C.F.R. §2.146 and TMEP Chapter 1700. If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
/Alice Benmaman/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 116
(703) 306-7911
FX: (703) 746-8116
RESPOND AT http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.