Change of Address

MEGAPHONE

Pilgrim Telephone, Inc.

Change Of Correspondence Address

The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field	Entered
SERIAL NUMBER	76496112
REGISTRATION NUMBER	3268714
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED	LAW OFFICE 115
MARK SECTION
MARK	MEGAPHONE
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current)
ORIGINAL ADDRESS	WALTER STEIMEL JR 901 NEW YORK AVENUENW WASHINGTON District of Columbia 20001 US 202-434-8290 202-434-8251 nytrademark@loeb.com
NEW CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
NEW ADDRESS	LOEB & LOEB LLP 901 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 300 WASHINGTON District of Columbia United States 20001-4797 202-618-5015 202-478-2924 dctrademark@loeb.com;wsteimel@loeb.com; waltersteimel@gmail.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA E-MAIL	YES
SIGNATURE SECTION
SIGNATURE	/Walter Steimel, Jr./
SIGNATORY NAME	Walter Steimel, Jr.
SIGNATORY DATE	07/25/2013
SIGNATORY POSITION	Attorney of record, Texas and DC Bar Member.
SIGNATORY PHONE NUMBER	(202) 618-5015
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY	YES
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE	Thu Jul 25 12:48:51 EDT 2013
TEAS STAMP	USPTO/CCA-XX.XXX.XXX.XXX- 20130725124851484724-8600 8651-5004fe5c224c6ad1f57a 7d477c52e14fdd6da27d397c9 d3ca92323c60d0d3abcd-N/A- N/A-20130725121359721468

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.