Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  76/485999

 

This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on August 28, 2003.

 

Applicant was requested to amend the identification of goods by listing the major parts of the system. The amendment to identification of goods submitted August 28, 2003 has been reviewed, but found unacceptable.

 

For the reasons stated below, the request to amend the identification of goods is maintained and made FINAL.

 

The Trademark Act requires a written application “specifying” the goods or services on or in connection with which an applicant uses, or has a bona fide intention to use, the mark in commerce. 15 U.S.C. § § 1051 (a)(1)(A) and 1051(b)(1)(A). To “specify” means to name in an explicit manner. Additionally, Trademark Rule 2.33(a)(1)(v), 37 C.F.R. § 2.33 (a)(1)(v), requires that the application specify the “particular” goods or services on or in connection with which the applicant uses, or has a bona fide intention to use, the mark. The identification of goods or services should set forth common names, using terminology, which is generally understood. For those product or services, which may not have common names, language, which is as clear and succinct as possible, should be used. Technical or esoteric language and lengthy descriptions of characteristics or use are not appropriate.

 

An acceptable identification of goods or recitation of services is required for three (3) reasons. First, it is important for the examining attorney to understand the exact nature of the goods and services for which registrations is sought, so that the attorney may properly analyze the application in accordance with the law and USPTO practices and procedures. Secondly, the language must be clear and acceptable for proper classification. Finally, the scope of the identification must be clear so that marks may be properly compared, particularly for Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion purposes. 15 U.S.C. § 1051(a)(1)(A) and 1051(b)(1)(A).

 

The goods listed in the application when filed were:

 

         Cross flow filtration and separation system for the separation and

         concentration of biological solutions in the biopharmaceutical and

         biotechnology fields.

 

Applicant was requested to amend the identification of goods by listing the major parts of the system. TMEP § 1402.03(a).

 

Applicant’s amendment filed August 28, 2003 consist of the following:

 

         Flow manifold, microporous membranes, product reservoir,

         pump, valves, gauges and piping for cross-flow filtration,

         separation and concentration of biological solutions in the

         biopharmaceutical and biotechnology fields.

 

Clearly, this amendment is unacceptable.

 

The wording “flow manifold” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite.  The applicant must amend the identification to specify the commercial name of the goods.  If there is no common commercial name for the product, the applicant must describe the product and its intended uses. TMEP §1402.01.

 

The wording “product reservoir” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite.  The applicant must amend the identification to specify the commercial name of the goods.  If there is no common commercial name for the product, the applicant must describe the product and its intended uses. TMEP §1402.01.

 

Applicant should amend the identification of goods in the following form:

 

         Cross flow filtration and separation system comprising… for the

         separation and concentration of biological solutions in the

         biopharmaceutical and biotechnology fields

 

The applicant must rewrite the identification of goods in its entirety because of the nature and extent of the amendment.  37 C.F.R. §2.74(b).

 

Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods or services that are not within the scope of the goods and services recited in the present identification.

 

 

 

 

/Amos T. Matthews/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 108

(703) 308-9108 ext. 293

(703) 746-8108 (fax)

 

 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.