Offc Action Outgoing

MUSASHI

Kabushiki Kaisha Adam Japan

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/482879

 

    APPLICANT:                          Kabushiki Kaisha Adam Japan

 

 

        

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    KAUSHAL R. ODEDRA, ESQ.

    WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, L.L.P.

    2033 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 800

    WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-1021

   

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3514

ecom106@uspto.gov

 

 

 

    MARK:          MUSASHI

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   TM03_012/KRO

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  76/482879

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.

 

Search Results

The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

Identification of Goods

The wording “billiard related goods” is indefinite and the applicant must list each item that applies individually by using its common commercial name (e.g., “billiard related goods, namely, cue sticks, chalk, balls, etc.),” in International Class 28, TMEP §1402.01.

 

On-line Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual information:  For the applicant’s reference the examining attorney provides the following address for the identification of goods and services manual on the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s web site:

 

http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/offices/tac/doc/gsmanual/

 

The applicant may wish to consult the on-line identification manual for a listing of acceptable common names of goods and services.  While the list is not exhaustive, the manual should give the applicant direction regarding proper international classification and information and specificity required in the applicant’s identification of goods and/or services.

 

Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.

 

Combined Applications

It appears that at least a majority of the applicant’s goods will be properly classified in International Class 28.  However, if the applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple‑class, application, the applicant must comply with each of the following.

 

(1)  The applicant must list the goods/services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order.  TMEP §1403.01.

 

(2)  The applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods/services not covered by the fee already paid.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1) and 2.86(a); TMEP §§810.01 and 1403.01.  Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing a trademark application is $335 for each class.  This applies to classes added to pending applications as well as to new applications filed on or after that date.  

 

Significance of Mark

The applicant must indicate whether “MUSASHI” has any significance in the relevant trade, any geographical significance, or any meaning in a foreign language.  37 C.F.R. §2.61(b).

 

            NOTE: The examining attorney has search only the mark as it appears on the drawing page.  If the mark has a translation, the translation will be searched by the examining attorney when submitted.

 

Unsigned Declaration

The application must be signed, and verified or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20.  37 C.F.R. §2.33.  No signed verification or declaration was provided.  Therefore, the applicant must provide a signed verification or signed declaration attesting to the facts set forth in the application.

 

Because the application is based on Trademark Act Section 1(b) or 44, 15 U.S.C. §1051(b) or 1126, the verified statement must include an allegation that the applicant had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the application filing date.  37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(2)(i), 2.34(a)(3)(i) and 2.34(a)(4)(ii); TMEP §§804.02, 806.01(b), 806.01(c), 806.01(d) and 1101. 

 

The following is a properly worded declaration under 37 C.F.R. Section 2.20.  At the end of the response, the applicant should insert the declaration signed by someone authorized to sign under 37 C.F.R. Section 2.33(a).

 

The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. 1001, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting registration, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under 15 U.S.C. 1051(b), he/she believes applicant to be entitled to use such mark in commerce; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation, or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; and that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

 

                                                                                    _____________________________

                                                                                                            (Signature)

                                                                 

 

                                                                                    _____________________________

                                                                                    (Print or Type Name and Position)

 

                                                                                    _____________________________

                                                                                                            (Date)

 

 

If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.

 

 

 

 

/Jeffery C. Coward/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 106

Phone: (703) 308-9106 ext. 133

Fax: (703) 746-8106

 


 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed