To: | Air Movement Technologies, Inc. (jstevens@burrandbrown.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 76480275 - AIR MATT - 877T027 |
Sent: | 1/29/04 8:04:04 PM |
Sent As: | ECom105 |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/480275
APPLICANT: Air Movement Technologies, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: STEPHEN P. BURR BURR & BROWN P.O. BOX 7068 SYRACUSE NY 13261
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom105@uspto.gov
|
MARK: AIR MATT
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 877T027
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: jstevens@burrandbrown.com |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/480275
This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on 10/14/03.
The requirement that applicant provide informational materials about the goods is maintained and made FINAL.
Refusal under Section 2(e)(1)
The examining attorney has considered the applicant’s arguments carefully but found them unpersuasive. Accordingly, the refusal under Section 2(e)(1) is maintained and made FINAL.
It is not necessary that a term describe all of the purposes, functions, characteristics or features of the goods/services to be merely descriptive. It is enough if the term describes one attribute of the goods/services. In re H.U.D.D.L.E., 216 USPQ 358 (TTAB 1982); In re MBAssociates, 180 USPQ 338 (TTAB 1973). TMEP §1209.01(b).
Please note the attached dictionary and website listings which confirm that the wording air mat is merely descriptive of mat which utilizes air to transfer patients.
The fact that applicant’s product allows air to flow through, does not change the descriptive analysis. This product consists, in large part of a mat which utilizes air to transfer a patient. Accordingly, the applied for mark AIR MATT is merely descriptive of such a patient air mat product. Applicant has merely combined the two most important characteristics or features of its product, the fact that it uses air and is a mat, and adopted them as its mark.
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or (3) filing of a petition to the Director if permitted by 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b). 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §715.01. Regarding petitions to the Director, see 37 C.F.R. §2.146 and TMEP Chapter 1700. If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
In all correspondence to the Patent and Trademark Office, the applicant should list the name and law office of the examining attorney, the serial number of this application, the mailing date of this Office action, and the applicant’s telephone number.
/John E. Michos/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 105
703 308-9105 ext. 152
703 872-9825 (fax)
ecom.105@uspto.gov
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.