UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/477247
APPLICANT: Amersham Biosciences AB
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: FRANK P. PRESTA NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C. 1100 NORTH GLEBE RD., 8TH FLOOR ARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom108@uspto.gov
|
MARK: MIDJET
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 3438-287
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/477247
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
Search Results
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
Identification of Goods
The term “system” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant must amend the identification by listing the major parts of the system. TMEP §1402.03(a).
The applicant must rewrite the identification of goods in its entirety because of the nature and extent of the amendment. 37 C.F.R. §2.74(b).
Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods or services that are not within the scope of the goods and services recited in the present identification.
The nature of the goods on which the applicant uses the mark is not clear from the present record. The applicant must submit samples of advertisements or promotional materials. If such materials are not available, the applicant must submit a photograph of the goods and describe their nature, purpose and channels of trade. 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §§814 and 1402.01(d).
Basis for Registration
The applicant has filed asserting use in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. §1051(a), and claiming priority under Section 44(d), 15 U.S.C. §1126(d), based on a foreign application. Under these circumstances, the applicant may rely solely on use in commerce as the basis for registration and not the expected foreign registration, and still claim the benefit of the priority filing date. If the applicant chooses to do so, this Office will approve the case for publication without waiting for the applicant to submit the foreign registration. Of course, the application must be in condition for publication in all other respects. If the applicant wishes to proceed relying on use in commerce as the sole basis for registration, with the claim of priority, the applicant should so advise the examining attorney. TMEP §§806.02(f) and 806.04(b).
If the applicant does not so indicate, this Office will presume that the applicant wishes to rely on the foreign registration as an additional basis for registration and will expect the applicant to submit a true copy, a photocopy, a certification, or a certified copy of the foreign registration and, if appropriate, an English translation. It is customary for the translator to sign the translation. TMEP §§1004.01 and 1004.01(b).
Foreign Registration
Applicant is advised that since it has a domicile in Sweden, the United States Patent and Trademark Office will usually accept that country as the applicant’s country of origin without further inquiry. However, the applicant has filed this application based upon United Kingdom application number 2309398. Upon submission of the foreign registration applicant will be required to show that the applicant has a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment in United Kingdom. In other words, the applicant must provide evidence that United Kingdom is a “country of origin.” Trademark Act Section 44(c), 15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §§1002.01 and 1002.04.
Significance of Mark
The applicant must indicate whether “MIDJET” has any significance or meaning in the relevant trade, any geographical significance, or any meaning in a foreign language. 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b).
Fee Increase
Fee increase effective January 1, 2003
Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing an application for trademark registration will be increased to $335.00 per International Class. The USPTO will not accord a filing date to applications that are filed on or after that date that are not accompanied by a minimum of $335.00.
Additionally, the fee for amending an existing application to add an additional class or classes of goods/services will be $335.00 per class for classes added on or after January 1, 2003.
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Amos T. Matthews/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 108
(703) 308-9108 ext. 293
(703) 746-8108 (fax)
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.