Offc Action Outgoing

SPORTBACK

MITSUBISHI JIDOSHA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO:           76/473975

 

    APPLICANT:         MITSUBISHI JIDOSHA KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISH ETC.

 

 

        

*76473975*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

  JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN

  OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT

  1940 DUKE ST

  ALEXANDRIA VA  22314-3454

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:       SPORTBACK

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   229647US33

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

 

Serial Number  76/473975

 

This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on December 10, 2004.

 

The refusal under Trademark Act Section 2(d) is withdrawn.

The Section 1(b) basis is maintained in the record in light of the following.

 

Section 23 Refusal

Registration is refused on the Supplemental Register because the proposed mark is generic for applicant’s goods.  Trademark Act Section 23(c), 15 U.S.C. §1091(c); See In re Gould Paper Corp., 834 F.2d 1017, 5 USPQ2d 1110 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (SCREENWIPE held generic as applied to premoistened antistatic cloths for cleaning computer and television screens); In re Northland Aluminum Products, Inc., 777 F.2d 1556, 227 USPQ 961 (Fed. Cir. 1985) (BUNDT, a term that designates a type of cake, held generic for ring cake mix); In re Central Sprinkler Co., 49 USPQ2d 1194 (TTAB 1998) (ATTIC generic for sprinklers installed primarily in attics); In re Stanbel Inc., 16 USPQ2d 1469 (TTAB 1990), aff’d, 20 USPQ2d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (ICE PAK for reusable ice substitute for use in food and beverage coolers held generic; even assuming a contrary holding, evidence submitted by applicant deemed insufficient to establish acquired distinctiveness); In re Analog Devices Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1808 (TTAB 1988), aff’d, 871 F.2d 1097, 10 USPQ2d 1879 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (ANALOG DEVICES held generic for devices having analog capabilities); TMEP §§1209.01(c) et seq.

 

The currently and previously attached evidence from LEXIS-NEXIS and the Internet shows that the proposed mark is generic and thus incapable of distinguishing the applicant’s goods because it indicates a type of vehicle.  For example, please note the following generic use:  Kia plans to bring it back to America in mid-1999 in sedan and  sport-back  models.  Automotive News, August 10, 1998.  See attached.

 

Although the trademark examining attorney has refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal to register by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.

 

NOTICE:  FEE CHANGE   

 

Effective January 31, 2005 and pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, the following are the fees that will be charged for filing a trademark application:

 

(1) $325 per international class if filed electronically using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS); or 

 

(2)   $375 per international class if filed on paper

 

These fees will be charged not only when a new application is filed, but also when payments are made to add classes to an existing application. If such payments are submitted with a TEAS response, the fee will be  $325 per class, and if such payments are made with a paper response, the fee will be $375 per class.

 

The new fee requirements will apply to any fees filed on or after January 31, 2005.

 

NOTICE:  TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATION

 

The Trademark Operation has relocated to Alexandria, Virginia.  Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

Applicants, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.

 

 

/Mary Boagni/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 114

571-272-9130

Law Office 114 fax: 571-273-9114

 

 

HOW TO RESPOND TO THIS OFFICE ACTION:

  • ONLINE RESPONSE:  You may respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions, but if the Office Action issued via email you must wait 72 hours after receipt of the Office Action to respond via TEAS).
  • REGULAR MAIL RESPONSE:  To respond by regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing return address above and include the serial number, law office number and examining attorney’s name in your response.

 

STATUS OF APPLICATION: To check the status of your application, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.uspto.gov.

 

VIEW APPLICATION DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Documents in the electronic file for pending applications can be viewed and downloaded online at http://portal.gov.uspto.report/external/portal/tow.

 

GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: For general information about trademarks, please visit the Office’s website at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY SPECIFIED ABOVE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MAIL-IT REQUESTED: FEBRUARY 27, 2005                        10083K

 

        CLIENT:

       LIBRARY: MARKET

          FILE: AUTNWS

 

YOUR SEARCH REQUEST AT THE TIME THIS MAIL-IT WAS REQUESTED:

 NOCAPS (SPORT BACK OR SPORTBACK)

 

NUMBER OF STORIES FOUND WITH YOUR REQUEST THROUGH:

      LEVEL   1...      16

 

LEVEL    1 PRINTED

 

THE SELECTED  STORY NUMBERS:

1-2,6-7,10

 

DISPLAY FORMAT: 30 VAR KWIC

 

SEND TO: BOAGNI, MARY

         TRADEMARK LAW LIBRARY

         2101 CRYSTAL PLAZA ARC

         MAILBOX 314

         ARLINGTON VIRGINIA 22202-4600

 

**********************************07680**********************************
                                                                      PAGE    1

                           LEVEL 1 - 1 OF 16 STORIES

 

               Copyright 2005 Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News

                        Copyright 2005 Chicago Tribune 

                                Chicago Tribune

 

                           February 20, 2005, Sunday

 

KR-ACC-NO: TB-NEW-CARS-20050220

 

LENGTH: 1839 words

 

HEADLINE: Chicago Tribune New Cars column

 

BYLINE: By Jim Mateja

 

 BODY:

 

   ... sedan with trunk that bowed in 2004.

 

   Some might see a styling relationship with a station wagon, but we see it

more closely associated with the hatchback Pontiac Vibe and Toyota Matrix, which

Kia does, too, by calling it a  sportback  and begging those who use the term

wagon to wash their mouths out with soap.

 

   The Dodge Caliber concept, which will be unveiled at the Geneva Auto Show

next month to herald the replacement for the Neon, is another member of the

 sportback  crowd.

 

   Unfortunately, while the Spectra5 is equal to Vibe and Matrix in fashionable

styling and convenient cargo access through the hatchlid, it falls short in one

important category: It's offered only in front-wheel-drive. Vibe and ...
                                                                      PAGE    2

                           LEVEL 1 - 2 OF 16 STORIES

 

                   Copyright 2004 Financial Times Information

                              All rights reserved

                  Global News Wire - Europe Intelligence Wire

                     Copyright 2004 Sunday Business Post 

                              Sunday Business Post

 

                               November 21, 2004

 

FT-ACC-NO: A20050105353-A398-GNW

 

LENGTH: 858 words

 

HEADLINE: HIGH ON STYLE, LOW ON EXTRAS

 

BYLINE: Ferdia O'Dowd

 

 BODY:

 

   The term 'estate' is being replaced with more inventive model descriptions

such as ' sport back',  and 'sport wagon' by car manufacturers.

 

   What was at one time regarded as a utilitarian if necessary member of the

line-up is now something associated with image and lifestyle.

 

   A prime example of this trend is the recently-arrived Audi A3 Sport back. ...
                                                                      PAGE    3

                           LEVEL 1 - 6 OF 16 STORIES

 

                   Copyright 2003 Crain Communications Inc. 

                                    AutoWeek

 

                             April 21, 2003, Monday

 

SECTION: Pg. 4

 

LENGTH: 730 words

 

HEADLINE: REALLY BIG SHEW; Even Ed Sullivan would have given props to this

year's domestically driven New York show

 

BYLINE: BOB GRITZINGER

 

 BODY:

 

   ... Brat-like Baja by offering a third version of its crossover, a 210-hp,

turbocharged 2.5-liter model. Meanwhile, Mitsubishi unveils an all-new 2004

Galant sedan, a redesigned 2004 Diamante and a  sportback  five-door version of

the Lancer. Toyota tops off the import tank with an all-new 2004 Prius

electric/gasoline hybrid and its most American car yet, the 2004 Solara coupe

due later this year. Solara was developed in ...
                                                                      PAGE    4

                           LEVEL 1 - 7 OF 16 STORIES

 

                   Copyright 2002 Crain Communications Inc. 

                                    AutoWeek

 

                           November 25, 2002, Monday

 

SECTION: Pg. 8

 

LENGTH: 446 words

 

HEADLINE: Product blitz fuels Mitsubishi makeover

 

BYLINE: JOHN D. STOLL

 

 BODY:

 

   ... Evo model, Lancer's welcome in the United States has inspired Mitsubishi

to swap introduction dates for the freshened Lancer, originally slated to launch

in Japan and then come here. Instead, a higher-horsepower Lancer with ample

exterior changes-and a  sportback  wagon model-will come here next fall,

followed by the Japanese intro. Gagnon says the decision means Mitsubishi is

finally shifting its focus from Japan to North America.

 

   After the redone Lancer debuts, Endeavor-an all-new midsize ...
                                                                      PAGE    5

                           LEVEL 1 - 10 OF 16 STORIES

 

                   Copyright 1998 Crain Communications Inc. 

                                Automotive News

 

                                August 10, 1998

 

SECTION: News; Pg. 32

 

LENGTH: 773 words

 

HEADLINE: S. KOREA HAS LONG LIST TO TEMPT U.S. TASTES 

 

BYLINE: MARK RECHTIN  Staff Reporter 

 

 BODY:

 

   ... wheel drive. It will be built off the Sonata platform.

 

   KIA

 

   Avella: The basic-small car was sold as the Ford Aspire until last year. Kia

plans to bring it back to America in mid-1999 in sedan and  sport-back  models.

It will be powered by a 1.5-liter engine.

 

   Elan: The Lotus-based convertible acquired by Kia is still on America's wish

list, but federalization costs hamper the process.

 

   Sephia: Kia's bread-and-butter ...

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed