UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/473533
APPLICANT: Cabinet Vision, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: THOMAS W. SCROGGINS TANNER & GUIN,LLC 2711 UNIVERSITY BOULEVARD TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 35401
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom111@uspto.gov
|
MARK: CABINET VISION
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: N/A
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/473533 MARK: CABINET VISION (WITH A DESIGN)
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
NO CONFLICTING REGISTERED MARK NOTED
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
RECITATION OF SERVICES/IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
The identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant is referred to the Office’s website at www.gov.uspto.report/web/offices/tac/doc/gsmaual/ for additional information regarding the classification and identification of the applicant's goods.
The applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:
CLASS 9
“Computer programs, namely, software for use in developing and planning custom cabinetry or architectural casework, software used to architecturally simulate and render designs of custom cabinetry or architectural casework in a computer graphic format, software for use in creating a custom database of customer information, software to use in tracking components used in the creation of custom cabinetry or architectural casework and software for use in generating machine ready code for use in the creation of custom cabinetry or architectural casework.”
CLASS 41
“Computer education training services.”
Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.
DISCLAIMER
Trademark Act Section 6(a), 15 U.S.C. §1056(a), permits the Office to require a disclaimer of an unregistrable component of a mark. Trademark Act Section 2(e), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e), bars the registration of a mark which is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive of the goods. Therefore, the examining attorney may require the disclaimer of a portion of a mark which, when used in connection with the goods or services, is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive. If an applicant does not comply with a disclaimer requirement, the examining attorney may refuse registration of the entire mark. TMEP §1213.01(b).
The applicant must insert a disclaimer of “CABINET” in the application because the wording is a feature of the applicant’s goods and services. See: CABINET: “[a]n upright, cupboardlike repository with shelves, drawers, or compartments for the safekeeping or display of a collection of objects or materials.”[1] Trademark Act Section 6, 15 U.S.C. §1056; TMEP §§1213 and 1213.08(a)(i).
A properly worded disclaimer should read as follows:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “CABINET” apart from the mark as shown.
SPECIMENS ARE UNACCEPTABLE FOR THE SPECIFIED GOODS
The specimen is unacceptable as evidence of actual service mark use because they appear to be advertisement. Invoices, announcements, order forms, bills of lading, leaflets, brochures, publicity releases and other printed advertising material generally are not acceptable specimens for goods. In re Bright of America, Inc., 205 USPQ 63 (TTAB 1979); TMEP §§904.05 and 904.07. See In re Ultraflight Inc., 221 USPQ 903 (TTAB 1984). The applicant must submit a specimen showing the mark as it is used in commerce. 37 C.F.R. §2.56. Examples of acceptable specimens are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, and photographs that show the mark on the goods or packaging. TMEP §§904.04 et seq. The applicant must verify, with an affidavit or a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20, that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application. 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a); TMEP §904.09.
Georgia Ann Carty
/Georgia Ann Carty/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 111
(703) 308-9111, Ext. 150
ecom 111 @USPTO.gov
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR SPECIFIC INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.
[1]The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition copyright © 1992 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Electronic version licensed from INSO Corporation; further reproduction and distribution restricted in accordance with the Copyright Law of the United States. All rights reserved.