UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
|
SERIAL NO: 76/462307
APPLICANT: Masisa S.A.
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: GEORGE W. LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC THE JENIFER BUILDING 400 SEVENTH STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20004-2201 |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom115@uspto.gov
|
|
MARK: MASISA
|
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: T33694US0
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/462307
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
The identification of goods, “wood boards” is unacceptable as broad because the goods could be classified in several international classes. For example, wood boards used as building materials are properly classified in International Class 19. Wood boards in the nature of “chopping boards” are classified in International Class 21. TMEP §1402.01.
The applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:
Building materials, namely, wood boards, in International Class 19; and/or
Wood chopping boards for kitchen use, in International Class 21.
An application under Trademark Act Section 44(e), 15 U.S.C. §1126(e), must include a copy of a foreign registration from the applicant’s country of origin. The applicant’s country of origin must either be a party to a convention or treaty relating to trademarks to which the United States is also a party, or must extend reciprocal registration rights to nationals of the United States by law. See TMEP §§1002.01 and 1004.
The application identifies goods that may be classified in several international classes. Therefore, the applicant must either: (1) restrict the application to the number of class(es) covered by the fee already paid, or (2) pay the required fee for each additional class(es). 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a)(2); TMEP §§810.01, 1401.04, 1401.04(b) and 1403.01.
Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing a trademark application is $335 for each class. This applies to classes added to pending applications as well as to new applications filed on or after that date. 37 C.F.R. §2.6(a)(1).
If the applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple‑class, application, the applicant must comply with each of the following.
(1) The applicant must list the goods/services by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order. TMEP §1403.01.
(2) The applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods/services not covered by the fee already paid. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1) and 2.86(a); TMEP §§810.01 and 1403.01. Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing a trademark application is $335 for each class. This applies to classes added to pending applications as well as to new applications filed on or after that date.
The application must be signed, and verified or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20. 37 C.F.R. §2.33. No signed verification or declaration was provided. Therefore, the applicant must provide a signed verification or signed declaration attesting to the facts set forth in the application, and attesting that applicant had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the application filing date. 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(2)(i), (a)(3)(i) and (a)(4)(ii); TMEP §§804.02, 806.01(b), 806.01(c), 806.01(d) and 1101.
The following declaration is provided for the applicant's convenience:
The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. 1001, and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any resulting registration, declares that he/she is properly authorized to execute this application on behalf of the applicant; he/she believes the applicant to be the owner of the trademark/service mark sought to be registered, or, if the application is being filed under 15 U.S.C. §1051(b), 1126(d) or 1126(e), he/she believes applicant to be entitled to use such mark in commerce; that the applicant had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods or services listed in the application as of the application filing date; to the best of his/her knowledge and belief no other person, firm, corporation, or association has the right to use the mark in commerce, either in the identical form thereof or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods/services of such other person, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive; and that all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.
_____________________________
(Signature)
_____________________________
(Print or Type Name and Position)
_____________________________
(Date)
The applicant must indicate whether “MASISA” has any significance in the relevant trade, any geographical significance, or any meaning in a foreign language. 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b).
The application does not contain a copy of the foreign registration. Therefore, the applicant must submit a true copy, a photocopy, a certification, or a certified copy of the foreign registration. If the foreign certificate of registration is not written in English, the applicant must provide an English translation. The translator should sign the translation. See TMEP §§1004.01 and 1004.01(b).
Application Based on Sections 1(b) and 44(e)
The applicant has filed relying on its claim of a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b), 15 U.S.C. §1051(b), and on a foreign registration under Section 44(e), 15 U.S.C. §1126(e). The foreign registration alone may serve as the basis for obtaining a U.S. registration resulting from this application. The applicant must advise the examining attorney, however, if the applicant intends to rely solely on the foreign registration as the basis for registration.
Unless the applicant indicates otherwise, this Office will presume that the applicant wishes to rely on Section 1(b) as well as on Section 44(e) as the bases for registration. In this case, although the application may be approved for publication, the mark will not be registered until an acceptable allegation of use has been filed.
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Michael Souders/
Law Office 115
(703) 308-9115 ext. 208
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.