UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/457802
APPLICANT: Costa, Manuel
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: STEPHEN L. BAKER BAKER & RANNELLS 626 NORTH THOMPSON STREET RARITAN, NEW JERSEY 08869
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom111@uspto.gov
|
MARK: NUSTA
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: N/A
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/457802
This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on April 4, 2003. The amendment to the identification of goods is not acceptable.
The proposed amendment of the identification is unacceptable because the wording “potable water, table water and sparkling water” designates that are not within the scope of the identification that was set forth in the application at the time of filing. While an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06 et seq. and 1402.07.
The applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:
International Class 032: Drinks, namely, soft drinks.
TMEP section 804
Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.71(b); TMEP section 804.09. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any goods that are not within the scope of goods set forth in the present identification.
This requirement is made FINAL.
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or (3) filing of a petition to the Commissioner if permitted by 37 C.F.R. Section 2.63(b). 37 C.F.R. Section 2.64(a). Regarding petitions to the Commissioner, see 37 C.F.R. Section 2.146; TMEP sections 1702 and 1704. If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.65(a).
/Karen M. Strzyz/
Karen Marie Strzyz
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 111
703-308-9111 ext. 470
fax 703-746-6334
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.