Examiners Amendment

TURBO SCRUB

Conceptual Marketing and Development, Inc.

TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 76456663 - TURBO SCRUB - N/A

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
To: Conceptual Marketing and Development, In ETC. (kmueller@kjmatlaw.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 76456663 - TURBO SCRUB - N/A
Sent: 3/11/03 5:54:55 PM
Sent As: ECom111
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/456663

 

    APPLICANT:         Conceptual Marketing and Development, In ETC.

 

      

 

       

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

KIM J. MUELLER

LAW OFFICES OF KIM J MUELLER

451 ARDEN WAY

SACRAMENTO CA 95815-3003

 

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3513

ecom111@uspto.gov

 

 

If no fees are enclosed, the address should include the words "Box Responses - No Fee."

    MARK:          TURBO SCRUB

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   N/A

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 kmueller@kjmatlaw.com

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4.  Your telephone number and email address.

 

 

Serial Number  76/456663

 

 

EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT

 

The application has been AMENDED as indicated below.  Please note that if the identification of goods or services has been amended below, any future amendments must be in accordance with 37 C.F.R. 2.71(a); TMEP section 1402.07(e).  No response is necessary unless there is an objection to the amendment.  If there is an objection to the amendment, the applicant should notify the examining attorney immediately.

 

The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

The applicant has classified the goods incorrectly.  Accordingly, the application is amended to classify the goods in International Class 7.

 

Please, note, the decision as to the proper classification of goods or services is a purely administrative matter which is within the sole discretion of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  In re Tee‑Pak, Inc., 164 USPQ 88 (TTAB 1969).

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                           /GAF/ 

Geoffrey A. Fosdick

Trademark Attorney

Law Office 111

(703) 308-9111 ext. 421

geoffrey.fosdick@uspto.gov

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed