UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/454226
APPLICANT: TOWERS, PERRIN, FORSTER & CROSBY, INC.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: GLENN A. GUNDERSEN DECHERT 4000 BELL ATLANTIC TOWER 1717 ARCH STREET PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2793 |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3513 ecom114@uspto.gov
|
MARK: SPECIALTY CALL CENTER
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 52757-095
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/454226
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.
The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). TMEP §704.02.
The applicant has classified the services incorrectly. The applicant must amend the application to classify the services in International Class 35, except as noted below. 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7) and 2.85; TMEP §§1401.02(a) and 1401.03(b).
The applicant has classified employee and retiree benefits counseling in the same International Class as the rest of its services. The correct classification of these services is International Class 36. The applicant must either delete these items or add International Class 36 to the application. 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7) and 2.85; TMEP §1401.04(b).
The wording “collecting information” in the recitation of services is unacceptable as indefinite. The applicant must amend the recitation to specify the common commercial name of the services or to indicate their nature. TMEP §1402.11. While surveys and public opinion polling are acceptable in Class 35, as noted above, the mere collection of information, per se, is not necessarily a cognizable service and/or may be properly classified elsewhere. Clarification is required.
The following criteria have evolved for determining what constitutes a service, in connection with which a mark may be registered: (1) a service must be a real activity; (2) a service must be performed to the order of, or for the benefit of, someone other than the applicant; and (3) a service cannot be merely an ancillary activity or one which is necessary to the applicant’s larger business. In re Canadian Pacific Ltd., 754 F.2d 992, 224 USPQ 971 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Moore Business Forms, Inc., 24 USPQ2d 1638 (TTAB 1992); In re Betz Paperchem, Inc., 222 USPQ 89 (TTAB 1984); In re Integrated Resources, Inc., 218 USPQ 829 (TTAB 1983); In re Landmark Communications, Inc., 204 USPQ 692 (TTAB 1979). See: Trademark Act Sections 1, 2, 3 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1052, 1053 and 1127; TMEP §§1301.01 et seq. It appears, in general, that the “information collection” activity may be merely ancillary to the performance of other specific services and should be deleted from the recitation of services.
Amendment is required. The applicant must rewrite the recitation of services in its entirety because of the nature and extent of the amendment. 37 C.F.R. §2.74(b).
If the applicant prosecutes this application as a combined, or multiple‑class, application based on use in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a), 15 U.S.C. §1051(a), the applicant must comply with each of the following:
(1) The applicant must specifically identify the services in each class and list them by international class with the classes listed in ascending numerical order. TMEP §1403.01.
(2) The applicant must submit a filing fee for each international class of goods/services not covered by the fee already paid. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1) and 2.86(b); TMEP §§810.01 and 1403.01. Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing a trademark application is $335 for each class. This applies to classes added to pending applications as well as to new applications filed on or after that date.
(3) The applicant must submit:
(a) dates of first use and first use in commerce and one specimen for each class that includes goods or services based on use in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(a). The dates of use must be at least as early as the filing date of this application, 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1) and 2.86(a), and the specimen(s) must have been in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application, and/or
(b) a statement of a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce on or in connection with all the goods or services specified in each class that includes goods or services based on a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Trademark Act Section 1(b), where such statement was not included for the goods or services in the original application.
(4) The applicant must submit an affidavit or a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 signed by the applicant to verify (3) above. 37 C.F.R. §§2.59(a) and 2.71(c).
Please note that, while an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, the applicant may not amend to include any services that are not within the scope of the services recited in the present identification.
Further action awaits response to the above.
/David H. Stine/
Trademark Attorney
Law Office 114
(703)308-9114 x154
ecom114@uspto.gov
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.