Offc Action Outgoing

QUIK-CHANGE

THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/436588

 

    APPLICANT:                          Porter-Cable Corporation

 

 

        

*76436588*

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    SEAN PATRICK SUITER

    SUITER & ASSOCIATES PC

    14301 FNB PARKWAY, STE 220

    OMAHA, NE 68154-5299

   

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA 22313-1451

 

 

 

 

    MARK:          QUIK-CHANGE

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   5809.152-US-

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

Serial Number  76/436588

 

This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on November 1, 2004.

 

The applicant (1) explained the discrepancy in the body of the statement of use as to the owner of the mark; and (2) submitted a clear copy of the originally-submitted specimen.  Both of the foregoing are acceptable.  However, the following new issue is raised by the applicant’s specimen submission.

 

Mark Differs on Drawing and Specimen

 

The drawing displays the mark as QUIK-CHANGE (Stylized).  However, this differs from the display of the mark on the specimen, where it appears as QUIK-CHANGE (Stylized), but stylized in a different manner than the mark shown on the drawing page.  The typeface on the specimen is different than the typeface on the drawing.  The applicant must either:

 

(1)  submit a new drawing of the mark that agrees with the specimen; or

 

(2)  submit a substitute specimen that shows use of the mark shown in the drawing.

 

The applicant may not amend the drawing if the amendment would materially alter the character of the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.72(b); TMEP §§807.14, 807.14(a) and 807.14(a)(i).  In this case, the applicant would be permitted to amend the drawing of the mark so that it is consistent with the mark shown on the specimen.  However, if it does so, the applicant is advised that the amended drawing would then be inconsistent with the mark shown on the specimen originally submitted with the application for the use-based goods, i.e., the “POWER TOOLS, NAMELY POWER DRIVEN RECIPROCATING SAWS FOR WOOD AND METAL CUTTING; JIG SAW BLADE CLAMP SOLD AS AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF JIG SAWS.”

 

If a substitute specimen is submitted, the applicant must verify, with an affidavit or a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20, that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the time allowed to the applicant for filing a statement of use.  37 C.F.R. §§2.59(b) and 2.72(b); TMEP §904.09.  The statement supporting use of the substitute specimen must read as follows: 

 

The substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the time allowed to the applicant for filing a statement of use. 

 

A prompt response to this Office action will expedite the handling of this matter.

 

 

NOTICE:  TRADEMARK OPERATION RELOCATION

 

The Trademark Operation has relocated to Alexandria, Virginia.  Effective October 4, 2004, all Trademark-related paper mail (except documents sent to the Assignment Services Division for recordation, certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol, and requests for copies of trademark documents) must be sent to:

 

Commissioner for Trademarks

P.O. Box 1451

Alexandria, VA  22313-1451

 

Applicants, attorneys and other Trademark customers are strongly encouraged to correspond with the USPTO online via the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html.

 

 

 

/Barbara A. Gaynor/

Barbara A. Gaynor

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 115

(571) 272-9164

 

 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

You may respond formally using the Office's Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Office Action form (visit http://eteas.gov.uspto.report/V2.0/oa242/WIZARD.htm and follow the instructions therein, but you must wait until at least 72 hours after receipt if the office action issued via e-mail).  PLEASE NOTE: Responses to Office Actions on applications filed under the Madrid Protocol (Section 66(a)) CANNOT currently be filed via TEAS.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed