The mark consists of both a stylized depiction of the letters "CVE" which is the acronym for Common Vulnerabilities Enumeration and the word "COMPATIBLE" beneath the depiction of CVE.
Mark For: ONE COMPATIBLE™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 76433191 |
Mark Literal Elements | ONE COMPATIBLE |
Mark Drawing Type | 3 - AN ILLUSTRATION DRAWING WHICH INCLUDES WORD(S)/ LETTER(S)/NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | SERVICE MARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) 2004-03-29 |
Basis | 1(b) |
Class Status | ACTIVE |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | No |
Intent To Use | Yes |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Law Office Assigned | M40 |
Employee Name | LE, KHANH M |
2002-07-19 | Application Filed |
2004-02-22 | Abandon |
2004-03-25 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
2004-03-25 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2004-03-29 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | The MITRE Corporation |
Address | 7515 Colshire Drive M/S N680 McLean, VIRGINIA UNITED STATES 221027508 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DELAWARE |
Application | IMAGE/TIFF | 2002-07-19 |
Drawing | IMAGE/TIFF | 2002-07-19 |
Duplicate Application | TIFF | 2002-07-19 |
Duplicate Drawing | TIFF | 2002-07-19 |
XSearch Search Summary | TIFF | 2003-01-08 |
XSearch Search Summary | TIFF | 2003-01-08 |
Offc Action Outgoing | TIFF | 2003-01-09 |
Response to Office Action | MULTI | 2003-07-08 |
Response to Office Action | TIFF | 2003-07-08 |
File Jacket | JPEG | 2003-07-18 |
Notation to File | XML | 2003-08-22 |
Offc Action Outgoing | MULTI | 2003-08-22 |
XSearch Search Summary | TIFF | 2003-08-22 |
Notice of Abandonment | APPLICATION/XML | 2004-03-26 |
26.01.28 | Circles with irregular circumferences; Miscellaneous circular designs with an irregular circumference |
26.11.21 | Rectangles that are completely or partially shaded |
26.11.25 | Rectangles with one or more curved sides |
181102 | Ships' wheels; Steering wheels; Wheels, steering |
260128 | Circles with irregular circumferences; Miscellaneous circular designs with an irregular circumference |
261121 | Rectangles that are completely or partially shaded |
261125 | Rectangles with one or more curved sides |
(ABANDONED)
IC 042. US 100 101. G & S: Providing information relating to compatibility in the field of computer security by affixing the mark to computer software
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
D10000 | "COMPATIBLE" |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2004-03-25 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2003-08-22 | |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-07-23 | |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2003-07-08 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-07-08 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2003-01-09 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-01-06 | 76738 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.