To: | Keck Garrett Associates, Inc. (bcanning@burkelaw.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 76432927 - SPY STIXS - T00033.20522 |
Sent: | 6/27/03 9:27:39 AM |
Sent As: | ECom111 |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/432927
APPLICANT: Keck Garrett Associates, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC 600 ATLANTIC AVENUE BOSTON, MA 02210-2211
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom111@uspto.gov
|
MARK: SPY STIXS
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: T00033.20522
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: bcanning@burkelaw.com |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/432927
This letter responds to the applicant's communication filed on 05-29-03. The applicant declined to submit the required disclaimer of the term “STIXS”. As such, that requirement is continued and made final.
Response For A Final Refusal
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are either (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, or (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.64(a). If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.65(a).
Disclaimer
As discussed in the first Office action, the applicant must disclaim the descriptive wording "STIXS" apart from the mark as shown. Trademark Act Section 6, 15 U.S.C. Section 1056; TMEP sections 1213 and 1213.02(a). Trademark Act Section 6(a), 15 U.S.C. §1056(a), permits the Office to require a disclaimer of an unregistrable component of a mark. Trademark Act Section 2(e), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e), bars the registration of a mark which is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive of the goods. Therefore, the examining attorney may require the disclaimer of a portion of a mark which, when used in connection with the goods or services, is merely descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive, or primarily geographically descriptive. If an applicant does not comply with a disclaimer requirement, the examining attorney may refuse registration of the entire mark. TMEP §1213.01(b).
A disclaimer does not remove the disclaimed matter from the mark. It is simply a statement that the applicant does not claim exclusive rights in the disclaimed wording or design apart from the mark as shown in the drawing.
The term “STIXS” must be disclaimed because the applicant has identified the goods as “candy”, and candy often comes in stick form. It is unlikely that the applicant has chosen this term arbitrarily, given the nature of the goods. Nor is the term at issue unitary. There is no unusual or different meaning imparted by these terms when used together, and the term “STIXS” is not incongruous as applied to the goods.
Further, the Office has a long standing practice of disclaiming the term “stick” or “sticks” when used in connection with candy. Please see the attached examples. Finally, terms as common as “peppermint stick” and “stick of gum” are strong evidence in their own right that the term is descriptive when used to identify different types of candy, and the widespread use of these terms contravenes the applicant’s statement that “the Applicant knows of no significance nor a meaning for the phrase such that a disclaimer should be required”.
The computerized printing format for the Trademark Official Gazette requires a standard form for a disclaimer. TMEP section 1213.09(a)(i). A properly worded disclaimer should read as follows:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use STICKS apart from the mark as shown.
See In re Owatonna Tool Co., 231 USPQ 493 (Comm'r Pats. 1983).
/Susan Leslie DuBois/
Susan Leslie DuBois
Examining Attorney
Law Office 111
703-308-9111 ext.413
EMAIL: ecom111@uspto.gov
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.