UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/416191
APPLICANT: Peckenpaugh, Sally A.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: Thomas D. Peckenpaugh Jackson, DeMarco & Peckenpaugh 2030 Main Street Suite 1200 Irvine CA 92614
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 |
MARK: TATE
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 00035
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: jwraith@jdplaw.com |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address. |
Serial Number 76/416191
This letter responds to the applicant's communication filed on 11 April 2003
Surname
Registration was refused under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(4), 15 U.S.C. Section 1052(e)(4), because the subject matter for which registration is sought is primarily merely a surname.
The examining attorney has considered the applicant's arguments carefully but has found them unpersuasive. For the reasons below, the refusal under Section 2(e)(4) is maintained and made FINAL.
Applicant seeks to register the mark TATE for articles of clothing. TATE is a surname and attached to the first Office action were listings from a telephone directory taken from the Internet. The applicant responded that TATE is a rare surname. The Internet evidence belies applicant statement as it clearly shows that TATE is a common surname. The mark TATE looks like a surname and the applicant has presented no evidence to show it is other than a surname. TATE has no dictionary meaning other than that of a surname nor is it a geographical location. See the listings from a word dictionary and a geographic dictionary that show no listing for TATE other than that of a surname (exhibit 1.)
Based on the above reasons, the refusal under Section 2(e)(4) is made FINAL
The informalities involving the citizenship of applicant and the identification of goods have been resolved.
Although the examining attorney has refused registration on the Principal Register, the applicant may amend the application to seek registration on the Supplemental Register. Trademark Act Section 23, 15 U.S.C. §1091; 37 C.F.R. §§2.47 and 2.75(a); TMEP §§801.02(b), 815 and 816 et seq.
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are either (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, or (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.64(a). If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. Section 2.65(a).
/Angela Micheli/
Examining Attorney, Law Office 108
(703) 308-9108 ext. 253
(703) 746-8108 fax
angela.micheli@uspto.gov
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.