KHATANGA
Translumina Gmbh
Mark For: KHATANGA™ trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 76415394 |
| Mark Literal Elements | KHATANGA |
| Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
| Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
| Standard Character Claim | No |
| Register | PRINCIPAL |
| Current Location | TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2004-11-14 |
| Basis | 44(d) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | No |
| Current Use | No |
| Intent To Use | No |
| Filed ITU | No |
| 44D Filed | Yes |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Domestic Representative | MICHAEL J. STRIKER |
| Attorney Name | MICHAEL J. STRIKER |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | SOUDERS, MICHAEL J |
Timeline
| 2002-05-29 | Application Filed |
| 2004-10-13 | Abandon |
| 2004-11-14 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2004-11-14 | Status: Abandoned because the applicant failed to respond or filed a late response to an Office action. To view all documents in this fi |
| 2004-11-14 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  TRANSLUMINA GMBH |
| Address | Neue Rottenburger Strasse 50 72379 Hechingen GERMANY |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
| Legal Entity State | GERMANY |
Documents
 Application | IMAGE/TIFF | 2002-05-29 |
| Drawing | IMAGE/TIFF | 2002-05-29 |
 Duplicate Application | 2002-05-29 | |
| Duplicate Drawing | 2002-05-29 | |
| XSearch Search Summary | 2002-09-13 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2002-09-18 | |
| Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2003-03-04 | |
| Response to Office Action | 2003-03-04 | |
| Unclassified-Other | 2003-03-28 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2003-04-07 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2003-04-09 | |
| Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2003-08-01 | |
| Response to Office Action | 2003-08-01 | |
| File Jacket | 2003-08-19 | |
| Suspension Letter | 2003-08-31 | |
| Suspension Inquiry | 2004-04-12 | |
| Notice of Abandonment | APPLICATION/XML | 2004-11-15 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
(ABANDONED)
IC 010. US 026 039 044. G & S: SURGICAL IMPLANTS COMPRISING ARTIFICIAL MATERIAL
| International Codes: | 10 |
| U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0101 | SURGICAL IMPLANTS COMPRISING ARTIFICIAL MATERIAL |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2004-11-15 | |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2004-11-14 | |
| INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 2004-04-12 | |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2003-09-03 | |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2003-08-22 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-08-12 | |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-08-01 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-08-01 | |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2003-04-09 | |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-03-04 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2003-03-04 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-09-18 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-09-12 | 76596 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 