To: | Rhodes, Arthur B. (jgregory@middreut.com) |
Subject: | TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 76410292 - RHODES - ZD620/91001 |
Sent: | 1/14/03 8:23:34 AM |
Sent As: | ECom104 |
Attachments: |
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/410292
APPLICANT: Rhodes, Arthur B.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: JULIE ANN GREGORY MIDDLETON REUTLINGER 2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOWER LOUISVILLE KY 40202
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3513 ecom104@uspto.gov
|
MARK: RHODES
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: ZD620/91001
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: jgregory@middreut.com |
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/410292
The Office has reassigned this application to the undersigned examining attorney.
This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on December 6, 2002.
In its response, the applicant submitted an amended identification of goods, adding Class 11 to the application. For the reasons noted below, the amended identification of goods is unacceptable. The requirement for an acceptable identification of goods is maintained and made FINAL.
The amended identification of goods is unacceptable because it does not identify the goods with sufficient specificity. The wording “finishing ovens and dryers” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite because it does not indicate whether the ovens and dryers are for domestic, commercial, or industrial use. The applicant must amend the identification to specify the nature of the goods. TMEP §1402.01. The applicant may adopt the following wording, if accurate:
Finishing ovens and dryers for [specify, e.g., domestic, industrial, commercial] use, in International Class 11.
For the reasons noted above, the requirement for an acceptable identification of goods is maintained and made FINAL.
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are either (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, or (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a). If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
Catherine Pace Cain
Catherine Pace Cain
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 104
phone: (703) 308-9104 ext. 262
fax: (703) 746-8104
Fee increase effective January 1, 2003
Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing an application for trademark registration will be increased to $335.00 per International Class. The USPTO will not accord a filing date to applications that are filed on or after that date that are not accompanied by a minimum of $335.00.
Additionally, the fee for amending an existing application to add an additional class or classes of goods/services will be $335.00 per class for classes added on or after January 1, 2003.
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.