UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/390500
APPLICANT: Bank of Nova Scotia, The
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIE ONE PRUDENTIAL PLAZA 130 EAST RANDOLPH DRIVE, SUITE 3500 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601 |
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3513 ecom112@uspto.gov
|
MARK: SCOTIABANK
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 02-0795
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/390500
This letter responds to the applicant's communication filed on March 21, 2003.
The declaration is acceptable and has been entered into the record.
The identification of goods and services in International Classes 9, 16 and 39 is acceptable.
The applicant was required to submit an acceptable recitation of services. That requirement is maintained and made FINAL.
The wording “advertising, marketing and promoting of financial services” in the recitation of services is unacceptable as indefinite because the method of the advertising, marketing and promotional services is unclear. The applicant must amend the recitation to specify the common commercial name of the services. If there is no common commercial name for the services, the applicant must describe the services and indicate their nature. TMEP §1402.11.
The wording “advertising services namely advertising of financial services via a global computer network” in the recitation of services is unacceptable as indefinite because the wording is unclear. The applicant may amend this wording to “dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet in the field of financial services,” if accurate. TMEP §1402.11.
The proposed amendment of the identification is unacceptable because the wording “product demonstrations at conferences and/or trade shows “ designates services that are not within the scope of the identification that was set forth in the application at the time of filing. While an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06 et seq. and 1402.07.
The proposed amendment of the identification is unacceptable because the wording “import/export services” designates services that are not within the scope of the identification that was set forth in the application at the time of filing. While an application may be amended to clarify or limit the identification, additions to the identification are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §§1402.06 et seq. and 1402.07.
If the applicant overcomes the above refusal, then the wording “import/export services” in the recitation of services is unacceptable as indefinite because the wording is unclear. The applicant may amend this wording to “import and export agencies,” if accurate. TMEP §1402.11.
If the applicant adopts the suggested amendment to the identification of services, the applicant must amend the classification to International Class 35. 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7) and 2.85; TMEP §§1401 et seq.
Drawing Unacceptable
The applicant was required to submit an acceptable drawing. That requirement is maintained and made FINAL. The drawing is not acceptable because it is contains tape on its edges. The applicant must submit a new drawing showing the mark clearly and conforming to 37 C.F.R. §2.52. TMEP §807.07(a).
The requirements for a special‑form drawing are as follows:
(1) The drawing must appear in black and white; no color is permitted.
(2) Every line and letter must be black and clear.
(3) The use of gray to indicate shading is unacceptable.
(4) The lining must not be too fine or too close together.
(5) The preferred size of the area in which the mark is displayed is 2½ inches (6.1 cm.) high and 2½ inches (6.1 cm.) wide. It should not be larger than 4 inches (10.3 cm.) high or 4 inches (10.3 cm.) wide.
(6) If the reduction of the mark to the required size renders any details illegible, the applicant may insert a statement in the application to describe the mark and these details.
37 C.F.R. §2.52; TMEP §§807.01(b) and 807.07(a). The Office will enforce these drawing requirements strictly.
The Office prefers that the drawing be depicted on a separate sheet of smooth, nonshiny, white paper 8 to 8½ inches (20.3 to 21.6 cm.) wide and 11 inches (27.9 cm.) long, and that the sheet contain a heading listing, on separate lines, the applicant’s complete name; the applicant’s address; the goods or services recited in the application; and, if the application is filed under Section 1(a) of the Act, the dates of first use of the mark and of first use of the mark in commerce; or, if the application is filed under Section 44(d), the priority filing date of the foreign application. 37 C.F.R. §2.52(b); TMEP §§807.01(a), 807.01(b), 807.01(c) and 807.07(a).
For the foregoing reasons, this action is made FINAL.
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or (3) filing of a petition to the Director if permitted by 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b). 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a); TMEP §715.01. Regarding petitions to the Director, see 37 C.F.R. §2.146; TMEP Chapter 1700 regarding petitions. If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
/Esther Borsuk/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 112
Phone: (703) 306-7913
Fax: (703) 308-7184
ecom112@uspto.gov
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.