UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/387328
APPLICANT: OSG Tap & Die, Inc.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: GERALD T. SHEKLETON WELSH & KATZ, LTD. 120 SOUTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA, 22ND FLOOR CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom115@uspto.gov
|
MARK: NRT
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 86609
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/387328
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the statement of use filed on June 3, 2003 and has determined the following.
The drawing displays the mark as NRT. However, this differs from the display of the mark on the specimen, where it appears as H7 NRT BOTT S/O. The applicant cannot amend the drawing to conform to the display on the specimen because the character of the mark would be materially altered. 37 C.F.R. §2.72(b); TMEP §§807.14, 807.14(a) and 807.14(a)(i).
Therefore, the applicant must submit a substitute specimen that shows use of the mark as it appears on the drawing. 37 C.F.R. §2.51; TMEP §807.14. The applicant must verify, with an affidavit or a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20, that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the time allowed to the applicant for filing a statement of use. 37 C.F.R. §§2.59(b) and 2.72(b); TMEP §904.09.
Alternatively, applicant may attempt to show by way of argument that the other matter on the specimens has clear significance apart from that of trademark such that NRT may function as a trademark separate from the other matter appearing with it. See In re Raychem Corp., 12 USPQ2d 1399 (TTAB 1989) (TINEL-LOCK found to be substantially exact representation of mark TRO6AI-TINEL-LOCK-RING because TRO6AI was a stock number and RING was the name of the goods).
Please feel free to contact the undersigned attorney if you wish to discuss this application.
/John S. Yard/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 115
(703) 308-9115 x209
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.