Suspension Letter

AUDIOGALAXY

Audiogalaxy, Inc.

Suspension Letter

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/386949

 

    APPLICANT:                          Audiogalaxy, Inc.

 

     

 

        

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    STEVEN R. SPRINKLE

    GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP

    1221 SOUTH MOPAC EXPRESSWAY SUITE 400

    AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746

   

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3514

ecom110@uspto.gov

 

 

If no fees are enclosed, the address should include the words "Box Responses - No Fee."

    MARK:          AUDIOGALAXY

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  105000-90010

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

  

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4.  Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

Serial Number   76/386949

 

This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on 21 May 2003.

 

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION

 

Action on this application is suspended pending the disposition of:

 

                        - Application Serial No(s). 75-628330, 75-891842, 75-891595, 75-891571 and 75-891558 (As Application Serial No. 76-235908 has been abandoned, reference to this application as a potential bar to registration is WITHDRAWN.)

 

Since applicant's effective filing date is subsequent to the effective filing date of the above-identified application(s), the latter, if and when it registers, may be cited against this application.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.83.  A copy of information relevant to this pending application(s) was sent previously.  The applicant may request that the application be removed from suspension by presenting arguments related to the potential conflict between the relevant applications or other arguments related to the ground for suspension.  The applicant's election to present or not to present arguments at this time will not affect the applicant's right to present arguments later.

 

Section 2(d) Refusal – Continued

 

The examining attorney has considered the applicant’s arguments carefully, nevertheless she remains unpersuaded.  The applicant is advised that as “audio” is descriptive of the applicant’s goods and services it is of little, if any trademark significance.  The refusal under Section 2(d), citing U.S. Registration Nos. 2504820 and 2283620, is CONTINUED.

 

Amendments to the Record

 

The amended identification of goods and the amended recitation of services are accepted and  have been made of record.

 

Specimens – Withdrawn

 

In light of the amended identification of goods, the requirement for substitute specimens is WITHDRAWN.

 

 

/Katherine Stoides/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 110

(703) 308-9110 ext.166

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed