E-Mail Incoming

THINPREP

HOLOGIC, INC.

THINPREP - 76/383954


Attorney Docket: 09010.0006-00000

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

Applicant: Cytyc Corporation
Serial Number: 76/383954
Filing Date: March 19, 2002
Mark: THINPREP

Examining Atty: Charles L. Jenkins, Esq.
Law Office: 105

COMMISSIONER FOR TRADEMARKS
2900 Crystal Drive
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3513
ATTN: BOX RESPONSES NO FEE / ecom105@uspto.gov

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION / RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION

Applicant submits the following amendment and remarks in response to the Office Action dated March 11, 2003.

AMENDMENT

Please delete the description of goods in Class 10 and replace it with the following:

--Medical testing kits comprising catheters, slides, stains, collection vials, and cervical sampling devices and solutions for use in the detection and diagnosis of cancer and infectious diseases--

REMARKS

The Examining Attorney has issued a final refusal of this application on the grounds that the description of goods is unacceptable as indefinite. Specifically, the Examining Attorney requires that the Applicant specify the language "electronic imaging and image processing apparatus, namely, [specify components] for use in the field of cytology, including molecular diagnostics, and parts and attachments therefor" in Class 9 and the term "other diseases" in Class 10.

For the following reasons, Applicant respectfully requests that the Examining Attorney reconsider and withdraw the refusal to register the application.

1. ELECTRONIC IMAGING AND IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS

Applicant submits that the description "electronic imaging and image processing apparatus for use in the field of cytology, including molecular diagnostics, and parts and attachments therefor" is sufficiently definite for purposes of registration. Applicant notes that the Examining Attorney himself has approved virtually identical language in Applicant's co-pending application no. 76/383,990. Applicant encloses a copy of that application from the PTO's electronic database for the Examining Attorney's reference. Applicant therefore requests that the Examining Attorney withdraw the refusal to register the application based on the Class 9 description of goods.

Assuming that the Examining Attorney agrees with Applicant's request, Applicant notes that certain wording in the current description of goods in Class 9 has been mistakenly repeated when it was entered into the record. The Class 9 description of goods should read as follows, with the bracketed language (also in ALL CAPS) removed:

--Computer hardware and software use for in the detection and diagnosis of cancer and other diseases; microscopes for use in the detection and diagnosis of cancer and other diseases; electronic imaging and image processing apparatus for use in the field of cytology, including molecular diagnostics, and parts and [IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF CYTOLOGY, INCLUDING MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, AND PARTS AND] attachments therefor--


2. OTHER DISEASES

Applicant has amended the application to specify the term "other diseases." Applicant respectfully submits that the language "infectious diseases" is sufficiently definite for registration. Applicant attaches copies of four prior registrations on the Principal Register (Reg. Nos. 2651976, 2676146, 2735130, 2715352) whose descriptions of goods contain similar language. As such, the Examining Attorney should similarly accept this language as sufficient and withdraw the refusal to register as to the Class 10 description of goods.

Accordingly, Applicant respectfully requests that the application be approved for publication.

Respectfully submitted,

CYTYC CORPORATION

By: /jonathan m. gelchinsky/
Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
1300 I St. NW
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: (202) 408-4000
Fax: (202) 408-4400

Attorneys for Applicant

Dated: August 13, 2003

============================================================
CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION

I hereby certify that this correspondence is being transmitted by electronic mail to the United States Patent and Trademark Office on the date shown below.

Jonathan M. Gelchinsky
/jonathan m. gelchinsky/
August 13, 2003


E-Mail Incoming [image/jpeg]

E-Mail Incoming [image/jpeg]

E-Mail Incoming [image/jpeg]

E-Mail Incoming [image/jpeg]

E-Mail Incoming [image/jpeg]

E-Mail Incoming [image/jpeg]

E-Mail Incoming [image/jpeg]

E-Mail Incoming [image/jpeg]

E-Mail Incoming [image/jpeg]


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed