Suspension Letter

XCEL 102

Blue Bird Investment Corporation

Suspension Letter

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/377223

 

    APPLICANT:                          Blue Bird Investment Corporation

 

     

 

        

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI

    BAKER & MCKENZIE

    ONE PRUDENTIAL PLAZA

    130 E. RANDOLPH DRIVE, SUITE 3500

    CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60601

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3513

ecom104@uspto.gov

 

 

If no fees are enclosed, the address should include the words "Box Responses - No Fee."

    MARK:          XCEL 102

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:  02-0309

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

  

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4.  Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

Serial Number   76/377223      

 

NOTICE OF SUSPENSION

 

Action on this application is suspended pending the disposition of:

 

                        - Application Serial No(s). 76/015792

 

Since applicant's effective filing date is subsequent to the effective filing date of the above-identified application(s), the latter, if and when it registers, may be cited against this application.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.83.  A copy of information relevant to this pending application(s) was sent previously.  The applicant may request that the application be removed from suspension by presenting arguments related to the potential conflict between the relevant applications or other arguments related to the ground for suspension.  The applicant's election to present or not to present arguments at this time will not affect the applicant's right to present arguments later.

 

 

Likelihood of Confusion

 

In the initial Office action, registration was refused under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d), because the mark for which registration is sought so resembles the mark shown in U.S. Registration No. 1,628,203 as to be likely, when used on the identified goods, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.  TMEP §§1207.01 et seq.  The examining attorney has considered the applicant’s arguments carefully but has found them unpersuasive.  Therefore, the registration refusal under §2(d) is hereby maintained and continued.

 

 

Informational

 

Fee increase effective January 1, 2003

Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing an application for trademark registration increased to $335.00 per International Class.  The USPTO will not accord a filing date to applications that are filed on or after that date that are not accompanied by a minimum of $335.00.  Additionally, the fee for amending an existing application to add an additional class or classes of goods/services is $335.00 per class for classes added on or after January 1, 2003.

 

 

 

 

Matthew J. Pappas

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 104

703/308-9104 ext. 126

ecom104@uspto.gov (formal responses)

matthew.pappas@uspto.gov (informal)

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed