Offc Action Outgoing

CAREX

COMPASS HEALTH BRANDS CORP.

TRADEMARK REGISTRATION NO. 2666240 - CAREX - C055-

To: Apex Medical Corporation (trademarks@leehayes.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK REGISTRATION NO. 2666240 - CAREX - C055-
Sent: 01/16/13 07:18:10 AM
Sent As: PRG@uspto.gov
Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT REGISTRANT’S TRADEMARK REGISTRATION

    REGISTRATION NO.       2666240

 

    REGISTRANT:      Apex Medical Corporation

 

 

 January 16, 2013       

76366104

    CORRESPONDENT’S ADDRESS:

  Lance D. Reich

  LEE & HAYES, PLLC

  601 W. RIVERSIDE AVE., SUITE 1400

  SPOKANE WA 99201

 

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:

http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageC.htm

 

 

 

    MARK:       CAREX

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO.   C055-              

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 trademarks@leehayes.com

 

 

 

 POST REGISTRATION OFFICE ACTION

 

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 1/16/2013

Registration Number  2666240

 

The Combined Section 8 Affidavit & Section 9 Renewal Application was received on December 18, 2012.  The Section 9 portion of the combined filing can be granted.  However, the Section 8 portion is not accepted for the reason(s) set forth below.

 

ISSUES PERTAINING TO SECTION 8 PORTION ONLY

 

Specimen Issue

The owner of the registration provided a specimen with its Section 8 Affidavit; however, although the specimen is identified as a catalog or web page, it is unacceptable to show trademark use as a display associated with the goods because it fails to include a picture or a sufficient textual description of the goods/the mark in close proximity to a picture or textual description of the goods/the necessary ordering information/a weblink for ordering the goods and thus, appears to be mere advertising material.  See In re Sones, 590 F.3d 1282, 1288-89, 93 USPQ2d 1118, 1123-24 (Fed. Cir. 2009); In re Genitope Corp., 78 USPQ2d 1819, 1822 (TTAB 2006); In re Dell Inc., 71 USPQ2d 1725, 1727-29 (TTAB 2004); TMEP §904.03(h), (i); cf. Lands’ End, Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 513-14, 24 USPQ2d 1314, 1316 (E.D. Va. 1992). 

 

Material that functions merely to tell prospective purchasers about the goods, or to promote the sale of the goods, is not acceptable to show trademark use.  TMEP §904.04(b).  Leaflets, handbills, brochures, advertising circulars and other advertising material, while normally acceptable for showing use in connection with services, generally are not acceptable specimens for showing trademark use in connection with goods.  See In re MediaShare Corp., 43 USPQ2d 1304, 1307 (TTAB 1997); In re Schiapparelli Searle, 26 USPQ2d 1520, 1522 (TTAB 1993); TMEP §§904.04(b), (c), 1301.04.

 

A printed or web catalog, web page or similar specimen is acceptable to show trademark use as a display associated with the goods only if it includes the following:  (1) a picture of the relevant goods or a textual description that identifies the actual features or inherent characteristics of the goods such that the goods are recognizable, (2) the mark appearing sufficiently near the picture or textual description of the goods so as to associate the mark with the goods, and (3) information necessary to order the goods (e.g., an order form or a phone number, mailing address, or e-mail address for placing orders) or a visible weblink to order the goods.  See In re Sones, 590 F.3d at 1288-89, 93 USPQ2d at 1123-24; In re Genitope, 78 USPQ2d at 1822; In re Dell, 71 USPQ2d at 1727-29; Lands’ End, 797 F. Supp. at 513-14, 24 USPQ2d at 1316; TMEP §904.03(h).  Without this necessary information, the specimen is mere advertising and is not acceptable to show use in commerce for goods.  See, e.g., In re Osterberg, 83 USPQ2d 1220, 1222-24 (TTAB 2007); In re Genitope, 78 USPQ2d at 1822. 

 

Therefore, the owner must submit the following:

 

(1) A substitute specimen showing current use of the registered mark in commerce for each class of goods specified in the registration; and

 

(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  The substitute specimen was in use in commerce during the relevant period for filing the 10-year Section 8.”  37 C.F.R. §2.161(g); TMEP §1604.12(c).

 

Examples of specimens for goods are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, or displays associated with the actual goods at their point of sale.  See TMEP §§904.03 et seq.

 

Declaration Needed

The following statement and declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 can be used to verify the Section 8 Affidavit, if properly signed and dated:

 

The owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted specimen, during the relevant period for filing the 10-year Section 8.

 

The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statement may jeopardize the validity of this document, declares that s/he is properly authorized to execute this document on behalf of the owner, and all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

__________________________

Signature of Authorized Person

__________________________

Type or Print Name

__________________________

Date

 

The following persons are properly authorized to sign a Section 8 Affidavit on behalf of the owner:

(1) A person with legal authority to bind the owner (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner);

(2) A person with firsthand knowledge of the facts and actual or implied authority to act on behalf of the owner; or

(3)  An authorized attorney who has an actual written or verbal power of attorney or an implied power of attorney from the owner.

37 C.F.R. §§2.161(b), 2.193(e)(1); TMEP §1604.08(a).

 

RESPONSE TIME DEADLINE:  A complete response must be received within 6 months from the issuance date of this Office action.  The owner must respond to all inquiries set forth in this Office action to avoid cancellation of the registration.  37 C.F.R. §2.163(b)-(c); TMEP §1604.16.

 

DEFICIENCY SURCHARGE REQUIRED:  The owner must submit a $100 deficiency surcharge with its response to this Office action.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.164(a)(1); TMEP §1604.17(a).

 

 

 

 

 

 

/Vicky Copeland/

Vicky Copeland

Trademark Specialist

Post Registration Division

Office of Trademark Services

(571) 272-9521

Fax (571) 273-9521

 

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER:  Use the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Response to Post-Registration Office action form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageC.htm.  Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using TEAS, to allow for necessary system updates of the registration.  For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by (1) an individual registrant; (2) someone with legal authority to bind registrant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants); or (3) an authorized attorney, if one is appointed to represent registrant.  If a registrant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.

 

CHECK THE STATUS OF THE REGISTRATION:  To check the status of your registration at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the complete TARR screen.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/eTEASpageE.htm.

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED SPECIALIST.

 

 

 

Offc Action Outgoing [inode/x-empty]