UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/359525
APPLICANT: CELLECTIS S.A.
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: BARRY L. KELMACHTER BACHMAN & LAPOINTE, P.C. 900 CHAPEL STREET, SUITE 1201 NEW HAVEN CONNECTICUT 06510-2802
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom105@uspto.gov
|
MARK: EPIVADE
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 02-117T
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/359525
This letter responds to the applicant’s communication filed on November 21, 2003.
The identification of goods/recitation of services in International Classes 1 and 42 are both acceptable.
The wording “dna amplification,” “dna synthesize” and “dna analysis” in the identification of goods is unacceptable as indefinite.
Please note that, while the identification of goods may be amended to clarify or limit the goods, adding to the goods or broadening the scope of the goods is not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Therefore, applicant may not amend the identification to include goods that are not within the scope of the goods set forth in the present identification.
The identification of goods in international class 9 should be amended to read as follows, if accurate:
Scientific and laboratory devices, namely, [specify the common commercial name of the instrument, e.g. centrifuges and incubators] for enabling implementation of biochemical analysis techniques and molecular biology techniques; computer software programs for use in database management; diagnostic devices, namely, [specify the device, e.g. test tube] for non-medical use using technologies for avoiding epigenetic control in International Class 9.
This requirement is continued and made FINAL.
Please note that the only appropriate responses to a final action are either (1) compliance with the outstanding requirements, if feasible, or (2) filing of an appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a). If the applicant fails to respond within six months of the mailing date of this refusal, this Office will declare the application abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/Charles L.Jenkins,Jr./
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 105
(703)308-9105 ex. 142
(703)746-3022 fax
ecom105@uspto.gov
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.
Fee increase effective January 1, 2003
Effective January 1, 2003, the fee for filing an application for trademark registration will be increased to $335.00 per International Class. The USPTO will not accord a filing date to applications that are filed on or after that date that are not accompanied by a minimum of $335.00.
Additionally, the fee for amending an existing application to add an additional class or classes of goods/services will be $335.00 per class for classes added on or after January 1, 2003.