UNITED STATES PATENT
SERIAL NO: 76/341506 MARK: MEN | |
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: |
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: http://www.uspto.gov/teas/eTEASpageD.htm GENERAL TRADEMARK INFORMATION: http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm |
APPLICANT: Dennis, Felix | |
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS: | |
FOURTH ACTION
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, THE OFFICE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE.
This letter responds to applicant’s communication filed on November 7, 2007. Applicant has requested that its application seek registration on the Supplemental Register. Applicant’s request is refused because the proposed mark is not in lawful use in commerce. Please see the refusal below. The refusal to register under Section 2(e)(1) of the Trademark Act is continued and maintained.
Proposed Amendment to Supplemental Register Unacceptable – Section 1(b) Application
Registration is refused on the Supplemental Register because the proposed mark is not in lawful use in commerce, as required by Trademark Act Section 23. 15 U.S.C. §1091(a). Specifically, this application is based on applicant’s bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Section 1(b), and applicant has not yet submitted an amendment to allege use under 37 C.F.R. §2.76. 37 C.F.R. §§2.47(d), 2.75(b); TMEP §§815.02, 1102.03.
This refusal will be withdrawn if applicant (1) deletes the amendment to the Supplemental Register, or (2) submits an amendment to allege use that meets the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.76(b), (c). TMEP §§815.02, 1102.03.
If applicant maintains the amendment to the Supplemental Register and provides an acceptable amendment to allege use, the effective filing date of the application will be the date applicant met the minimum filing requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.76(e) for the amendment to allege use. 37 C.F.R. §§2.75(b), 2.76(b), (c); TMEP §§815.02, 816.02, 1102.03, 1104.01. In addition, the undersigned examining attorney will conduct a new search of the Office records for conflicting marks based on the later application filing date. See TMEP §§206.01, 1102.03.
If applicant has questions about its application or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned trademark examining attorney directly at the number below.
/Jordan A. Baker/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 102
571-272-8844
jordan.baker@uspto.gov
RESPOND TO THIS ACTION: If there are any questions about the Office action, please contact the assigned examining attorney. A response to this Office action should be filed using the form available at http://www.uspto.gov/teas/eTEASpageD.htm. If notification of this Office action was received via e-mail, no response using this form may be filed for 72 hours after receipt of the notification. Do not attempt to respond by e-mail as the USPTO does not accept e-mailed responses.
If responding by paper mail, please include the following information: the application serial number, the mark, the filing date and the name, title/position, telephone number and e-mail address of the person signing the response. Please use the following address: Commissioner for Trademarks,
STATUS CHECK: Check the status of the application at least once every six months from the initial filing date using the USPTO Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (