Change of Address

DIRAK

DIRAK DIETER RAMSAUER KONSTRUKTIONSELEMENTE GMBH

Combined Declaration of Use and/or Excusable Nonuse/Application for Renewal of Registration of a Mark under Sections 8 & 9

Change Of Correspondence Address

The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field	Entered
SERIAL NUMBER	76319531
MARK SECTION
MARK	DIRAK (stylized and/or with design, see http://uspto.report/TM/76319531/mark.png)
NEW CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS
NEW ADDRESS	DIRAK DIETER RAMSAUER KONSTRUKTIONSELEMENTE GMBH KONIGSFELDER STRASSE 1 ENNEPETAL Germany D-58256 eledonne@haugpartners.com; docket@haugpartners.com; cdebonis@haugpartners.com; mbrogan@haugpartners.com; mroopram@haugpartners.com
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA E-MAIL	YES
INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER
SIGNATURE SECTION
SIGNATURE	/marilyn matthes brogan/
SIGNATORY NAME	Marilyn M. Brogan
SIGNATORY DATE	03/22/2018
SIGNATORY POSITION	Attorney of Record, Member NY Bar
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE	Thu Mar 22 12:36:05 EDT 2018
TEAS STAMP	USPTO/S08N09-XX.XXX.XXX.X -20180322123605443112-340 3946-510bb7711615a3cdc80c 0c7234b8ac0259b92e5b68e4a 82f4d91d7461d75ba3414-CC- 10762-2018032212152797200 8

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.