Offc Action Outgoing

FAMI

AMAR, ROGER E.

Offc Action Outgoing

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/313723

 

    APPLICANT:                          AMAR, ROGER E.

 

 

        

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    KIT M. STETINA

    STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER

    75 ENTERPRISE STE 250

    ALISO VIEJO CA 92656-2626

   

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3513

ecom105@uspto.gov

 

 

 

    MARK:          FAMI

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   AMARR-002T

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT, WE MUST RECEIVE A PROPER RESPONSE TO THIS OFFICE ACTION WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF OUR MAILING OR E-MAILING DATE. 

 

Serial Number  76/313723

 

The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and determined the following.

General Refusal  - Descriptive

 

The examining attorney refuses registration on the Principal Register because the proposed mark merely describes the goods/services.  Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); TMEP §§1209 et seq.

General Principles Applicable to Section 2(e)(1) Cases

 

A mark is merely descriptive under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1), 15 U.S.C. 1052(e)(1), if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose or use of the relevant goods/services.  In re Gyulay, 820 F.2d 1216, 3 USPQ2d 1009 (Fed. Cir. 1987);  In re Bed & Breakfast Registry, 791 F.2d 157, 229 USPQ 818 (Fed. Cir. 1986); In re MetPath Inc., 223 USPQ 88 (TTAB 1984); In re Bright‑Crest, Ltd., 204 USPQ 591 (TTAB 1979); TMEP §1209.01(b).

 

The applicant applied to register the mark FAMI for “medical cannulae and medical surgical services.”  The proposed mark is descriptive, because it describes a feature of the relevant services.   Fami is an acronym for  “fat autograft muscle injection.”  The applicant’s surgical services are used for “fat autograft muscle injection.”  Fat is surgically extracted and replaced into your facial muscles.  The examining attorney refers to the excerpted articles from the examining attorney’s search in a computerized database in which FAMI appeared in four stories.  See attachments.

 

Therefore, the proposed mark is merely descriptive of the relevant services.

 

Specimens

 

The specimen is unacceptable as evidence of actual trademark use, because they are advertisements.  Invoices, announcements, order forms, bills of lading, leaflets, brochures, publicity releases and other printed advertising material generally are not acceptable specimens.  In re Bright of America, Inc., 205 USPQ 63 (TTAB 1979); TMEP §§904.05 and 904.07.  See In re Ultraflight Inc., 221 USPQ 903 (TTAB 1984).  The applicant must submit a specimen showing the mark as it is used in commerce.  37 C.F.R. §§2.56 and 2.88(b)(2).  Examples of acceptable specimens are tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, and photographs that show the mark on the goods or packaging.  TMEP §§904.04 et seq.  The applicant must verify, with an affidavit or a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20, that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the time allowed to the applicant for filing a statement of use.  37 C.F.R. §2.59(b); TMEP §§904.09 and 1109.09(b).

 

If an amendment of the dates‑of‑use clause is necessary in order to state the correct dates of first use, the applicant must verify the amendment with an affidavit or a declaration in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §2.20.  37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §§903.05 and 1109.09(a).

 

Search of The Office Records

 

The examining attorney has searched the Office records and has found no similar registered or pending mark which would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).  TMEP §704.02.

 

Response

 

Although the examining attorney has refused registration, the applicant may respond to the refusal to register by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.

 

/Charles L.Jenkins,Jr./

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 105

(703)308-9105 ex. 142

(703)746-3022 fax

ecom105@uspto.gov

 

 

How to respond to this Office Action:

 

To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.

 

To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.

 

To check the status of your application at any time, visit the Office’s Trademark Applications and Registrations Retrieval (TARR) system at http://tarr.gov.uspto.report/

 

For general and other useful information about trademarks, you are encouraged to visit the Office’s web site at http://www.gov.uspto.report/main/trademarks.htm

 

FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.

 

****************************082557******************************

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SEND TO: JENKINS, CHARLES             

         TRADEMARK LAW LIBRARY                  

         2101 CRYSTAL PLAZA ARC                 

         MAILBOX 314                            

         ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-4600
MAIL-IT REQUESTED: APRIL 16, 2003                           10083K

 

        CLIENT:

       LIBRARY: NEWS

          FILE: ALLNWS

 

YOUR SEARCH REQUEST AT THE TIME THIS MAIL-IT WAS REQUESTED:

 FAMI W/5 FAT AUTOGRAFT MUSCLE INJECTION!

 

NUMBER OF STORIES FOUND WITH YOUR REQUEST THROUGH:

      LEVEL   1...       4

 

LEVEL    1 PRINTED

 

DISPLAY FORMAT: VAR KWIC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SEND TO: JENKINS, CHARLES

         TRADEMARK LAW LIBRARY

         2101 CRYSTAL PLAZA ARC

         MAILBOX 314

         ARLINGTON VIRGINIA 22202-4600

 

 

 

**********************************01819**********************************



Copyright 2002 CanWest Interactive, a division of

 

CanWest Global Communications Corp.

 

All Rights Reserved  

The Star Phoenix (Saskatoon)

 

August 3, 2002 Saturday Final Edition

 

SECTION: Weekend Extra; Pg. E1 

 

LENGTH: 1665 words 

 

HEADLINE: Saving face: Vanity-driven boomers take extraordinary steps in quest to look good longer 

 

BYLINE: Jenny Lee 

 

DATELINE: VANCOUVER 

 

BODY:

 

   ... acid and Artecoll more suitable for coarse lines, lines between the nose and mouth, and drooling at the angle of the mouth. Laser treatment and peels are good for fine wrinkles, fine lines and pigment irregularities. Here's a run down of options: 

 

   - Fat Autograft Muscle Injection (FAMI) 

 

   What it is: A new method of injecting a patient's own fat on or near facial muscles to enhance the volume in faces that have narrowed with age. 

 

   Risks: Because the filler comes from the patient's own body, there is virtually no risk of allergic reaction. The ...



Copyright 2002 CanWest Interactive, a division of

 

CanWest Global Communications Corp.

 

All Rights Reserved  

Times Colonist (Victoria)

 

August 2, 2002 Friday Final Edition

 

SECTION: Life; Pg. D5 

 

LENGTH: 1686 words 

 

HEADLINE: Saving face: Pop into the doctor's office, a quick shot or two, and you can return to work minutes later, secure in the knowledge that your wrinkles and lines are about to disappear. 

 

BYLINE: Jenny Lee 

 

BODY:

 

   ... acid and Artecoll more suitable for coarse lines, lines between the nose and mouth, and drooling at the angle of the mouth. Laser treatment and peels are good for fine wrinkles, fine lines and pigment irregularities. 

 

   Here's a run down of options: 

 

   Fat Autograft Muscle Injection (FAMI) 

 

   What it is: A new method of injecting a patient's own fat on or near facial muscles to enhance the volume in faces that have narrowed with age. 

 

   Risks: Because the filler comes from the patient's own body, there is virtually no risk of allergic reaction. The ...



Copyright 2002 CanWest Interactive, a division of

 

CanWest Global Communications Corp.

 

All Rights Reserved  

Windsor Star

 

August 1, 2002 Thursday Final Edition

 

SECTION: HEALTH; Pg. B5 

 

LENGTH: 566 words 

 

HEADLINE: Ways to delay march of Father Time;

Procedures to not grow old gracefully 

 

BYLINE: Southam Newspapers 

 

DATELINE: Vancouver 

 

BODY:

 

   Here's a run-down of options: 

 

   * Fat Autograft Muscle Injection (FAMI): A new method of injecting a patient's own fat on or near facial muscles to enhance the volume in faces that have narrowed with age. 

 

   Cost: It is still too early to tell how long results will last. 

 

   * Intense Pulsed ...



Copyright 2002 CanWest Interactive, a division of

 

CanWest Global Communications Corp.

 

All Rights Reserved  

The Vancouver Sun (British Columbia, Canada)

 

July 22, 2002 Monday Final Edition

 

SECTION: Healthy Life; Jenny Lee; Pg. C7 

 

LENGTH: 1680 words 

 

HEADLINE: Saving face: In Part 4 of our Baby Boomers series, we tackle what some secretly think is more important than feeling good -- looking great 

 

BYLINE: Jenny Lee 

 

BODY:

 

   ... acid and Artecoll more suitable for coarse lines, lines between the nose and mouth, and drooling at the angle of the mouth. Laser treatment and peels are good for fine wrinkles, fine lines and pigment irregularities. 

 

   Here's a run down of options: 

 

   FAT AUTOGRAFT MUSCLE INJECTION (FAMI) 

 

   What it is: A new method of injecting a patient's own fat on or near facial muscles to enhance the volume in faces that have narrowed with age. 

 

   Risks: Because the filler comes from the patient's own body, there is virtually no risk of allergic reaction. The ...



****------------------------------------------------------------------------****

 

*       6 PAGES                84 LINES             JOB  82557   10083K        *

*  12:54 P.M. STARTED    12:55 P.M. ENDED               04/16/03               *

****------------------------------------------------------------------------****

****------------------------------------------------------------------------****

*                         EEEEE      N   N      DDDD                           *

*                         E          N   N      D   D                          *

*                         E          NN  N      D   D                          *

*                         EEE        N N N      D   D                          *

*                         E          N  NN      D   D                          *

*                         E          N   N      D   D                          *

*                         EEEEE      N   N      DDDD                           *

 

****------------------------------------------------------------------------****

 

****------------------------------------------------------------------------****

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SEND TO: JENKINS, CHARLES             

         TRADEMARK LAW LIBRARY                  

         2101 CRYSTAL PLAZA ARC                 

         MAILBOX 314                            

         ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-4600

P

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed