Mark For: THE CFO'S CHOICE® trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 76308779 |
Registration Number | 2746095 |
Mark Literal Elements | THE CFO'S CHOICE |
Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
Mark Type | SERVICE MARK |
Standard Character Claim | No |
Register | PRINCIPAL |
Current Location | SCANNING ON DEMAND 2008-05-15 |
Basis | 1(a) |
Class Status | SECTION 8 - CANCEL |
Primary US Classes |
|
Primary International Class |
|
Filed Use | No |
Current Use | Yes |
Intent To Use | No |
Filed ITU | Yes |
44D Filed | No |
44E Current | No |
66A Current | No |
Current Basis | No |
No Basis | No |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Domestic Representative | Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu Pc |
Attorney Name | Susan Upton Douglass |
Attorney Docket Number | ARY 0106434 |
Law Office Assigned | L70 |
Employee Name | JENNINGS, PATRICK J |
2001-07-26 | Date of First Use |
2001-07-26 | Date of Use In Commerce |
2001-09-04 | Application Filed |
2002-10-29 | Published |
2002-10-29 | Published for Opposition |
2003-08-05 | Trademark Registered |
2008-05-15 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
2010-03-07 | Cancelled |
2010-03-07 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2010-03-07 | Status: Registration cancelled because registrant did not file an acceptable declaration under Section 8. To view all documents in this |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Party: | ![]() |
Address | ONE MONTAGUE PLACE EAST BAY STREET NASSAU BAHAMAS |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | BAHAMAS |
![]() | IMAGE/TIFF | 2001-09-04 |
![]() | IMAGE/TIFF | 2001-09-04 |
![]() | 2002-06-11 | |
![]() | 2002-06-11 | |
![]() | 2002-06-11 | |
![]() | 2003-08-05 | |
![]() | IMAGE/TIFF | 2003-08-05 |
![]() | 2008-05-06 | |
![]() | 2008-05-06 | |
![]() | 2008-05-06 |
(CANCELLED)
IC 036. US 100 101 102. G & S: Actuarial services for CFOs of insurance companies in the nature of financial reporting, risk and value optimization, financial planning and forecasting, capital management services, and performance analysis in the nature of financial performance analysis and business decision support, namely, quantifying the financial impact of business decisions. FIRST USE: 20010726. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20010726
International Codes: | 36 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
D10000 | "CFO'S" |
Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
---|---|---|
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2010-03-07 | |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-05-15 | |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-08-05 | |
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2002-12-04 | |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-10-29 | |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-10-09 | |
USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 2002-08-19 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-08-19 | 78443 |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-08-19 | |
AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2002-07-02 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-06-27 | |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2002-06-11 | |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-06-11 | |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-06-11 | |
UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-04-24 | |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-12-17 | |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-12-13 | 76427 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.